- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:52:10 -0500
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Thanks! So, Greg, I think you ought to s/aggregate operation/aggregate/g in the SD document. Lee On 1/25/2011 9:46 AM, Steve Harris wrote: > Aggregates, the underlying functions (ie. not user-facing syntax) are Set Functions, distinguished in the text as e.g. MAX() — an aggregate, and Max() — a set function. > > The have very different signatures, so it's pretty confusing. > > - Steve > > On 2011-01-25, at 14:41, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > >> Are they "aggregates"? "aggregate operations"? "aggregate functions"? "set functions"? Something else? >> >> thanks, >> Lee >> >
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2011 14:52:46 UTC