- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:46:41 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I'm not sure it's any more central than: ?p rdfs:subPropertyOf* ?sp . :x ?p ?v and that one wont do what you'd hope, with the current semantics. - Steve On 2011-01-25, at 20:36, Andy Seaborne wrote: > The "?x :p{0} :const" case comes from: > > data: > :x :prop 123 . > > Query > { > ?p rdfs:subPropertyOf* :prop . > :x ?p ?v . > } > > properties aren't nodes (vertices = subject/objects) in the graph. > > Other than that, we could make { ?x :p{0} "o" } test on graph nodes (vertices), but this one is rather central to the semantic web. > > Andy > > On 25/01/11 16:53, Matthew Perry wrote: >> It seems strange to me to get any results with an empty dataset. I don't >> agree that terms from the query should be included in nodes(G). From my >> understanding, { ?x ?p "o" } will not match if "o" does not appear in >> the dataset, so I don't think { ?x :p{0} "o" } should match. >> >> - Matt >> >> On 1/25/2011 11:16 AM, Gregory Williams wrote: >>> On Jan 25, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Matthew Perry wrote: >>> >>>> I have reviewed the property path tests. We need tests for {m,n}, >>>> {,n}, ? and () for precedence, and I think we need more tests for >>>> combinations of property path constructs. >>>> >>>> I have disagreements with some of the answers given in the current >>>> tests. >>>> >>>> 1) pp15 -- I don't see why we are returning results on an empty dataset. >>> pp15 returns results because zero-length property paths bind the path >>> endpoints to any subjects or objects in the graph *and* any bound term >>> explicitly in the query. So in pp15, ?X :p{0} "o" will bind ?X="o". >>> Likewise for ?Y and ?Z. This is part of the evaluation semantics for >>> ZeroLengthPath >>> (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#sparqlAlgebraEval), >>> though maybe it could be made clearer in the description of property >>> paths in section 9 (from the evaluation semantics, I take "graph node" >>> in section 9 to include terms not necessarily in the dataset but that >>> are present in the query). >>> >>> .greg >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2011 20:47:17 UTC