- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:52:28 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>, W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 29 Mar 2011, at 18:46, Bijan Parsia wrote: > On 29 Mar 2011, at 18:19, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> On 29/03/11 18:04, Bijan Parsia wrote: >>> On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:54, Birte Glimm wrote: [snip] >>> Are you using Schema 1.1 (recommended even though not a recommendation!). >> >> Curious - why? > > My and Boris's experience in the OWL WG is that the 1.1 specs are *much* superior in organization, clarity, and detail and well as nailing down various aspects. [snip] We also thought it was going to be done "soon" :) Note that 1.1. seems to be what Oracle is doing (no surprise, their being still active in the XS group). Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 17:52:57 UTC