Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

On 03/01/11 17:16, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>> I noticed that change - OK for CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE.
> I'd think the same logic would apply to ASK (and to subselect, but
> I'll argue that below).
>

I just missed ASK from the list.

 Andy

Received on Monday, 3 January 2011 21:00:17 UTC