- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:36:40 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 23/01/11 22:06, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > On 1/23/2011 3:25 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> >> On 21/01/11 17:28, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: >>> I had an ACTION from an earlier teleconference to propose alternative >>> names for the HTTP/Update specification. Below are (numbered) >>> suggestions, starting with the 2 Dave Beckett suggested along with >>> others suggested during that teleconference: >>> >>> 1. SPARQL 1.1 RDF Graph Management Protocol >>> 2. SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset Management Protocol >>> 3. SPARQL 1.1 RESTful Graph Protocol >>> 4. SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Graph Protocol >>> 5. SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Graph Management Protocol >>> 6. SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol >>> >>> There was a suggestion of removing SPARQL 1.1 from the name, so >>> alternatives are: >>> >>> >>> 7. RDF Graph Management Protocol >>> 8. RDF Dataset Management Protocol >>> 9. RESTful Graph Protocol >>> 10. HTTP Graph Protocol >>> 11. HTTP Graph Management Protocol >>> 12. RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol >>> >>> My personal preference is 12 and 6 >>> >>> -- Chime >>> >> >> My preferences: >> >> 6 > 4 = 3 > 12 > 10 = 9 >> >> The pattern is: >> "SPARQL 1.1" >> "RDF Dataset" before "RDF Graph" before "HTTP Graph" > > I'm trying to wrap my head around the intuition for preferring "RDF > Dataset" because, to me, the spec in question deals with individual > graphs more than it deals with RDF Datasets (a default graph plus zero > or more named graphs). But From Andy and Chime's preferences, I'm > guessing I'm just not looking at it the right way, so can anyone help me > out? > > thanks, > Lee For me, it is that it deals in graphs but it operates on a container of graphs. This is most noticeable in the "?graph=", and that's one of the features the work is adding (together with the specific interpretation of POST as add triples). Or maybe I'm just dataset-centric due to current work. 3,4 are fine with me, 6 is just more preferred. Andy
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 09:37:45 UTC