Re: test case agg08 fixed

On Feb 15, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Following the discussion around agg08 two weeks ago
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-02-01#line0258
> 
> I marked agg08 as negativeSyntaxTest and added a new variant called agg08b, 
> that should be syntactically allowed, see 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/aggregates/
> 
> Please check whether agg08/agg08b can be approved and let me know!

These look good to me.

.greg

Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 15:11:49 UTC