- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:21:44 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, 4 "JSON result format" test cases can be found under http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ In this context, I also looked into http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html to see what I need to adapt for tests of the SPARQL results format... We have - actually - not really defined testing of the results format per se, but basically say that SELECT and ASK queries pass, if the result is equivalent after encoding results into RDF: "A SPARQL implementation passes a query evaluation test if the graph produced by evaluating the query against the RDF dataset (and encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary) is equivalent [RDF-CONCEPTS] to the graph named in the result (after encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary)." We haven't specified in detail how the conversion to DAWG result set vocabulary works in sparql/docs/tests/result-set.n3 Anyways, I think that's a minor issue, or does anyone think we need to define the mapping for each result format? (I think/hope it is quite obvious) So far, I just added some lines allowing the JSON results format, under the name/short-name suggested by Andy [1] in the test case README.html Opinions welcome! best, Axel 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JanMar/0140.html
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 13:22:22 UTC