- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 11:57:51 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:18 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Minor points - nothing for LC:
>
>
> >> [*] "*MUST* ....and the words appear as emphasized text, "
> >>
> >> The document does not use them in this way. They are not in bold later, and
> >> bold is reserved for HTTP Verbs.
> >> SmallCaps might be useful to emphasize.
> >
> > I switched to italics rather than bold.
>
> What's the intention for the rest of the document? These words are not
> used italized. I was expecting the RFC 2119 text to be in the same
> style as used in the document as a whole: capitals would be the easiest way.
>
> e.g.
> """
> A compliant implementation of this specification SHOULD accept HTTP
> requests directed at its Graph Store
> """
> has SHOULD in plain upper case.
>
> (not necessary for LC)
I kind of like the css trick OWL used. In the HTML, it says....
<em title="MUST in RFC 2119 context" class="RFC2119">MUST</em>
but the CSS says:
.RFC2119 { font-style: italic; text-transform: lowercase; }
so when it's rendered without italics (as in RFCs) it's MUST but if you
have italics, it uses them instead.
Total hack, of course. :-) smallcaps is probably how I would do it.
-- Sandro
Received on Sunday, 6 February 2011 16:58:03 UTC