- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:22:06 -0500
- To: "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com>, "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- cc: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I'm okay with making this change. Some time back Pat Hayes (in a comment thread) had suggested 'named graph resource'. I think 'content' is more along the lines of what I had in mind and now that the protocol manages default graphs as well as named graphs, 'RDF Graph content' seems more appropriate to me than 'RDF content'. -- Chime On 1/11/11 12:29 PM, "Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: > On 2011-01-11, at 14:20, Axel Polleres wrote: > >>> Why not use the terminology "RDF content"? >> >> >> While not really recalling whether we had that discussed as an alternative >> before >> (I remember we had some discussions back and forth before arriving at "RDF >> knowledge"), >> "RDF content" sounds like it could work... Opinions? > > I think "RDF Knowledge" is a bad term, for all the reasons people have pointed > out. > > RDF content is better. > > - Steve =================================== P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals in America by U.S.News & World Report (2010). Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 18:23:15 UTC