Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment

>> We all ready have:
>> [[ http-rdf-update/ sec 8:
>> Graph IRIs identify RDF knowledge (an information resource)
>> ]]
>> so why not use "information resource"?
>
> Because the resources identified by the graph IRIs in this protocol
> manipulate RDF content, RDF content is distinct from other IRs by the manner
> in which they facilitate machine understandability (which is the whole point
> of the SW), and there is already a priori uncertainty about what the IRI of
> a named graph identifies.

Why not use the terminology "RDF content"?

	Andy

Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 09:06:41 UTC