Draft response to GK-1

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:GK-1

GK-2 is a comment saying that point 2 of GK-1 can be ignored, so I don't think it requires an official response!

He raises a reasonable point about the interaction of ORDER BY, http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#convertSolMod could be construed as meaning that ORDER is preserved in aggregate operations, though the algebra does say it's operations on multisets.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 16:46:34 UTC