- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:31:18 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:GK-1 GK-2 is a comment saying that point 2 of GK-1 can be ignored, so I don't think it requires an official response! He raises a reasonable point about the interaction of ORDER BY, http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#convertSolMod could be construed as meaning that ORDER is preserved in aggregate operations, though the algebra does say it's operations on multisets. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 16:46:34 UTC