- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:15:44 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I think it's a good idea, the current name is a bit misleading. - Steve On 2011-03-22, at 14:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Based on recent conversations, there has been suggestions that since the dataset protocol is defined against (mutable) graph stores, the name we chose in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-01-25#resolution_3, that we change the name to reflect this. > > The current name is: > > SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol > > I'd imagine the alternative name would be: > > SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol > > Please use this thread to express support or concern about this proposed change. We'll make a final decision on the name next Tuesday, and I promise that we won't then revisit it again. :-) > > Lee > -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 15:16:25 UTC