- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:36:07 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 1 Feb 2011, at 15:12, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Unless you're trying to make a point that missed me, > the file extension > should be .srj. ...thanks, I had missed that! Fixed in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html and also in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ Apart from that, any further comments anyone? thanks, Axel > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/#mediaType > > (the SPARQL 1.0 uses this BTW) > > Andy > > On 01/02/11 13:21, Axel Polleres wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > 4 "JSON result format" test cases can be found under > > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ > > > > In this context, I also looked into > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html > > to see what I need to adapt for tests of the SPARQL results format... > > We have - actually - not really defined testing of the results format > > per se, but basically say that SELECT and ASK queries pass, if the result > > is equivalent after encoding results into RDF: > > > > "A SPARQL implementation passes a query evaluation test if the graph produced by evaluating the query against the RDF dataset (and encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary) is equivalent [RDF-CONCEPTS] to the graph named in the result (after encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary)." > > > > We haven't specified in detail how the conversion to DAWG result set vocabulary works in sparql/docs/tests/result-set.n3 > > Anyways, I think that's a minor issue, or does anyone think we need to define the mapping for each result format? (I think/hope it is quite obvious) > > > > So far, I just added some lines allowing the JSON results format, under the name/short-name suggested by Andy [1] in the test case README.html > > Opinions welcome! > > > > best, > > Axel > > > > 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JanMar/0140.html >
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:36:42 UTC