Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

On 03/01/11 17:16, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> +
> I like using BINDINGs in subselects for getting my head around (i.e.
> debugging) aggregate queries as it puts the pre-aggregated result set
> directly in my face. I use this for didactic and testing purposes:

More generally, inline data tables - i.e. the ability to put data into a 
query directly.  There are some ways to this - BINDINGS+SubSELECT but 
also anywhere AS is used can be combined with UNION to produce inline 
data.  The latter may be very verbose :-)

A more consistent approach might be:

    TABLE ?a ?b ?c { (1 2 3) (4 5 6) }

to put anywhere in graph pattern.

(not a proposal for this version of the spec)


Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 13:07:28 UTC