- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:09:15 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
OK, that's great then. My memory is not that good! I'll volunteer to add an example to protocol-1.1 doc if that helps. Thanks, Steve On 2011-01-24, at 14:06, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > We did discuss this at some point and I believe there was a consensus > that it ought to be "update". > > Lee > > > On 1/24/11, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: >> From what I remember from the protocol telecon, there will be two methods, >> one is x-www-form-urlencoded: >> >> POST /update/test HTTP/1.1 >> Host: localhost:8888 >> Accept: text/plain >> Content-Length: 62 >> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded >> >> [???]=INSERT%20DATA%20%7B%20%3Ca%3E%20%3Cp%3E%20%3Cb%3E%20%7D >> >> but what should [???] be? >> >> FWIW, 4store uses "update", and 5store uses "query" - hedging our bets :) >> >> I'm working on some cross-store client code at the moment, and it's a bit of >> a blocker. I have no particular preference, but would like a decision one >> way or the other. >> >> - Steve >> >> -- >> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited >> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK >> +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ >> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 >> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD >> -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 14:09:50 UTC