- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:59:50 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
ARQ passes those 4 tests. Andy On 01/02/11 22:36, Axel Polleres wrote: > > On 1 Feb 2011, at 15:12, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> Unless you're trying to make a point that missed me, >> the file extension >> should be .srj. > > ...thanks, I had missed that! Fixed in > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html > and also in > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ > > Apart from that, any further comments anyone? > > thanks, > Axel > >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/#mediaType >> >> (the SPARQL 1.0 uses this BTW) >> >> Andy >> >> On 01/02/11 13:21, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> 4 "JSON result format" test cases can be found under >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ >>> >>> In this context, I also looked into >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html >>> to see what I need to adapt for tests of the SPARQL results format... >>> We have - actually - not really defined testing of the results format >>> per se, but basically say that SELECT and ASK queries pass, if the result >>> is equivalent after encoding results into RDF: >>> >>> "A SPARQL implementation passes a query evaluation test if the graph produced by evaluating the query against the RDF dataset (and encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary) is equivalent [RDF-CONCEPTS] to the graph named in the result (after encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary)." >>> >>> We haven't specified in detail how the conversion to DAWG result set vocabulary works in sparql/docs/tests/result-set.n3 >>> Anyways, I think that's a minor issue, or does anyone think we need to define the mapping for each result format? (I think/hope it is quite obvious) >>> >>> So far, I just added some lines allowing the JSON results format, under the name/short-name suggested by Andy [1] in the test case README.html >>> Opinions welcome! >>> >>> best, >>> Axel >>> >>> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JanMar/0140.html >> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 15:00:32 UTC