- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:57:46 +0000
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- CC: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 02/03/11 02:22, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Andy Seaborne > <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: >> ..snip.. >> Something that might need describing is whether the service providing the >> RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol supports direct or indirect, or both, naming. > > Perhaps, the following specific sd:Features?: > - sd:DirectGraphIdentification > - sd:IndirectGraphIdentification > > i.e.: > > <> a sd:Service; > sd:defaultDatasetDescription</dataset> . > sd:feature sd:DirectGraphIdentification, sd:IndirectGraphIdentification . > > </dataset> a sd:RESTDataset > > -- Chime > +1 I've realised that in Fuseki, it going to be hard to provide direct naming and a service model without some degree of name clashing. A common usage model however, is likely to be an aggregating store, where there is no need for direct naming. Andy
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 10:58:36 UTC