- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:05:29 -0500
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Chime, What issues and/or TODOs remain before this document is ready for review? Please note that in today's teleconference we: RESOLVED: Rename "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" to "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" If you could update the wiki (either http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_Last_Call#Uniform_HTTP_Protocol or http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/HTTP-UPDATE-ISSUES) with any remaining items, that would be great. thanks, Lee On 1/25/2011 9:48 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > I have updated the editor's draft [1] of the Uniform HTTP Protocol for > Managing RDF Graphs. I haven't changed the title and will wait for > more feedback regarding the alternative names proposed. The following > changes were made to the document: > > [[[ > Changed 'RDF knowledge' to 'RDF graph content'. Removed section on > relative Base URI resolution (for relative values in the graph query > component). Added language requiring that query component values are > absolute URIs. Added language clarifying the role of the REST > architectural style and the intention and purpose behind the > specification > ]]] > > -- Chime > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2011 16:06:06 UTC