- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:02:30 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 3/24/2011 5:11 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > > """ > The USING [NAMED] <uri> clauses define a dataset to be used in matching > the WHERE clause. uris identify graphs in the graph store. All uris in a > USING <uri> form are used to form a graph which is the union of the > graphs named, and is teh default graph of the dataset, and all uris in a > USING NAMED <uri> form the named graph of the datasets. > > If a USING or USING NAMED clause appears, then this will override any > effect that WITH may have on the WHERE clause, and only the WHERE clause. > """ So would I not be (conformantly) allowed to implement update in such a way that I can match data retrieved from outside the graph store and use that to update graphs in the graph store? I don't do that today, but I surely will in the future :) Perhaps I could still do that via a creative interpretation of exactly what my graph store consists of. Anyway, I'm fine with this change, just still trying to understand it. Lee > Notes: "named graphs" is a term defined in SPARQL 1.0. > > Lots of s/uri/iri/ for the update document. > > Andy >
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:03:09 UTC