- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:50:20 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I hope I can squeeze reviewing in at short notice, so waiting should be ok. Regarding tests, I still have to add entailment tests, so can't really help with query tests in addition to that. Birte On 17 January 2011 15:59, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > > > On 16/01/11 21:32, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> >> On 1/16/2011 12:01 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>> Birte, >>> >>> I think it's better to wait until the doc is finished. If, however, it >>> fits better with your time, then there are just one or two specific >>> points that need work (+ general editorial) so reviewing the rest could >>> work. >>> >>> Overall: >>> >>> What we are missing most is tests. In the test work so far, we have >>> ended up sometimes identifying differing expectations of the design with >>> the WG. As LC is suppose to be design-stable and changes expensive, I >>> think it's important to have test coverage before LC to make sure the WG >>> is in proper agreement on the details. >> >> Hi Andy (and everyone else), >> >> Do you have a suggestion for how we can generate tests? Perhaps we ought >> to enumerate all of the SPARQL 1.1 features (beginning with query), and >> then split them up amongst all of us on the WG on Tuesday -- if each >> person came up with a few tests per feature, it would probably get us a >> long way to where we want to get. >> >> What do people think? >> >> Lee > > Works for me. > > There is some patchy coverage e.g. > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/grouping/ > > but I have not been tracking what's approved, what's covered and what areas > of debate there are. > > Andy > >> > >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> On 13/01/11 15:24, Steve Harris wrote: >>>> >>>> That's correct from ,my point of view. >>>> >>>> - Steve >>>> >>>> On 2011-01-13, at 11:07, Birte Glimm wrote: >>>> >>>>> Andy, Steve, >>>>> just to confirm that I did understand this correctly in the last >>>>> teleconf. I wait with the review until you tell me that the doc is >>>>> ready, right? >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Birte >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 >>>>> Computing Laboratory >>>>> Parks Road >>>>> Oxford >>>>> OX1 3QD >>>>> United Kingdom >>>>> +44 (0)1865 283520 >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Monday, 17 January 2011 16:50:50 UTC