public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2011 by author

Alexandre Passant

• Re: apologies (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Update formal model have been updated (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: http-rdf-update / editorial (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011 (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: SPARQL telecon agenda for 2011-Jan-18 (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Today's minutes (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 (Monday, 3 January)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: [TTL] Long literals (Thursday, 31 March)
• [TTL] Long literals (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Syntax actions : tests updated ; grammar updated (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Update comment (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 1) (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: tests to approve - property paths and syntax tests (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Draft response JB-2 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Update comment (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Update comment (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: delete-insert test cases (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Update comment (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Update comment (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: delete-insert test cases (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Kjeti;'s open comments (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: draft response GR-5 (Monday, 21 March)
• draft response to SC-1 (Monday, 21 March)
• draft response JB-5 (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: SPARQL Query review (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Minutes of the SPARQL WG telecon on 2011-03-15 (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: dataset protocol & service description (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: review service description conformance (Thursday, 10 March)
• SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) (Thursday, 10 March)
• [tests] New syntax tests for bad updates (Thursday, 10 March)
• SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 1) (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Executing the decision on blank bodes in DELETE (Tuesday, 8 March)
• review service description conformance (Tuesday, 8 March)
• DELETE templates and blank nodes. (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Deleting lists. (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft answer KK-7 (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: New property path tests (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Deleting lists. (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review of revised property path tests (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 1 March)
• DELETE - the process (Monday, 28 February)
• Fwd: avg testcase issues (was: Re: syntax error in testcase manifest) (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Review of revised property path tests (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Comment on Dataset-UNION (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Comment on Dataset-UNION (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol: Priority of the '?default' query component (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* (Monday, 14 February)
• Documents [was: Re: ACTION-284 Fed. Query review (part 1)] (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Saturday, 12 February)
• Affiliation change (Saturday, 12 February)
• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Friday, 11 February)
• [PP] Duplicates with :p* (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Response to DBeckett-1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Draft response to HK-2 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: 2011-02-08 SPARQL TC Agenda (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Sunday, 6 February)
• Service or graph store naming. (Friday, 4 February)
• Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Friday, 4 February)
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! (Wednesday, 2 February)
• All the docs. (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: CONSTRUCT and abstract queries (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 1 February)
• CommentResponse:JP-3 (Sunday, 30 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Saturday, 29 January)
• Re: fed query doc ready to review (Friday, 28 January)
• http-rdf-update / editorial (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Names (long and short) for JSON results doc (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• ACTION-368 : Check coverage and propose new/udpated test for syntax : DONE (Tuesday, 25 January)
• ACTION-331 Clarify the meaning of "potentially bound" : DONE (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: BIND tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: BIND tests (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Update Protocol messages (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: BIND tests (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: new version of fed query (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. (Thursday, 20 January)
• Syntax tests (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: Translation to Algebra (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: Generating tests [was: Re: Review SPARQL Query?] (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query? (Sunday, 16 January)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Sunday, 16 January)
• Re: new version of fed query (Sunday, 16 January)
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 11 January)
• SPARQL Update / editorial (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly (Monday, 3 January)

Axel Polleres

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Draft response JB-2 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Draft response JB-2 (was: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2)) (Monday, 28 March)
• Kjetil's comments... (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 1) (Monday, 28 March)
• ACTION-415 completed (Updates in SPARQL1.1 Update formal model ready for review) (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol (Wednesday, 23 March)
• reminder SPARQL TC starts in 5min... (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Kjeti;'s open comments (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Draft response JB-2 (was: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2)) (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Kjeti;'s open comments (Tuesday, 22 March)
• 2011-03-22 SPARQL TC Agenda (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: draft response to SC-1 (Monday, 21 March)
• draft response GR-5 (Monday, 21 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: question on PATCH (SPARQL 1.1 protocol and SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol ) (Thursday, 10 March)
• question on PATCH (SPARQL 1.1 protocol and SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol ) (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Draft answer KK-7 (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Tuesday, 1 March)
• MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Draft answer KK-7 (was: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7)) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• SPARQL TC 2011-03-01 Agenda (Monday, 28 February)
• Fwd: Reviewing the GeoSPARQL document? (Saturday, 26 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: DELETE-INSERT test cases (including bnodes) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Comment on Dataset-UNION (Tuesday, 22 February)
• SPARQL TC 2011-02-22 minutes and plan for next week (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Agenda 2011-02-22 (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: DELETE-INSERT test cases (including bnodes) (Monday, 21 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Monday, 21 February)
• DELETE-INSERT test cases (including bnodes) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Friday, 18 February)
• Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• ISSUE-33 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Test cases & entailment (Tuesday, 15 February)
• test case agg08 fixed (Tuesday, 15 February)
• ACTION-284 (completed) Fed. Query review (part 2) (Tuesday, 15 February)
• SPARQL TC 2011-02-15 Agenda (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Aggregates test case (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 (Monday, 14 February)
• ACTION-284 Fed. Query review (part 1) (Monday, 14 February)
• minutes from last time... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-02-08 (Monday, 14 February)
• 2011-02-08 SPARQL TC Agenda (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) (Thursday, 3 February)
• Re: CommentResponse:JP-3 (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Minutes from last week's TC are now online... (Tuesday, 1 February)
• aggregate tests cases ready to approve? (Tuesday, 1 February)
• JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 01, 2011 (Monday, 31 January)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 01, 2011 (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: BIND tests (Monday, 24 January)
• New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. (Thursday, 20 January)
• ACTION-363: Solicit a DERI reviewer for JSON results document (Thursday, 20 January)
• minutes from last TC... (Thursday, 20 January)
• Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: new version of fed query (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... (Tuesday, 11 January)
• quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Tuesday, 11 January)
• (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Agenda TC 2011-01-11 (Monday, 10 January)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Tuesday, 29 March)

Birte Glimm

• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Today's minutes (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Section about Property Paths in the Ent. Reg. spec (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review (Tuesday, 1 March)
• SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review (Friday, 25 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Thursday, 24 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Thursday, 24 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Test cases for approval (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Test cases & entailment (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Tuesday, 15 February)
• SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Friday, 11 February)
• Test cases & entailment (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Comments on Entailment Regimes from Zhe Wu (Tuesday, 8 February)
• CONSTRUCT and abstract queries (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: entailment profiles? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: entailment profiles? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Translation to Algebra (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: Generating tests [was: Re: Review SPARQL Query?] (Monday, 17 January)
• Review SPARQL Query? (Thursday, 13 January)

Carlos Buil Aranda

• Fwd: review of the GeoSPARQl specification (Tuesday, 29 March)
• draft response for WG-1 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• review of the GeoSPARQl specification (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: ACTION-284 (completed) Fed. Query review (part 2) (Monday, 14 March)
• regrets (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: regrets (Tuesday, 22 February)
• regrets (Tuesday, 22 February)
• minutes from today 2011-02-15 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: fed query doc ready to review (Friday, 28 January)
• fed query doc ready to review (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. (Thursday, 20 January)
• Re: new version of fed query (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: new version of fed query (Wednesday, 12 January)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 (Monday, 3 January)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Updates to Graph Store protocol editor's draft (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: dataset protocol & service description (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: question on PATCH (SPARQL 1.1 protocol and SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol ) (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Saturday, 5 February)
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! (Wednesday, 2 February)
• Re: Updated editors draft of HTTP RDF Update specification (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Updated editors draft of HTTP RDF Update specification (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011 (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification (Friday, 21 January)
• Change of status (Monday, 17 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Monday, 3 January)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Wednesday, 5 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: yacker grammar (Sunday, 2 January)

Gregory Williams

• Re: tests to approve - property paths and syntax tests (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: delete-insert test cases (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: delete-insert test cases (Wednesday, 23 March)
• delete-insert test cases (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: review service description conformance (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Questions about SPARQL 1.1 service description (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Sunday, 20 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: test case agg08 fixed (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 8 February)
• function tests (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) (Thursday, 3 February)
• Minutes from today's TC (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Pre-LC review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Review of Service Description Draft (Friday, 14 January)
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 11 January)

Ivan Herman

• FYI: Implementing SPARQL 1.1 Query - first findings (Saturday, 5 February)

Lee Feigenbaum

• tests to approve - property paths and syntax tests (Monday, 28 March)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 29, 2011 (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: draft response JB-5 (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: draft response to SC-1 (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: Update comment (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Update comment (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Update comment (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol (Wednesday, 23 March)
• SPARQL Minutes for March 22, 2011 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol (Tuesday, 22 March)
• reminder: telecon starts in 10 minutes (Tuesday, 15 March)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 15, 2011 - one hour earlier outside of the US! (Monday, 14 March)
• dataset protocol & service description (Monday, 14 March)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - 2011-03-08 (Monday, 7 March)
• SPARQL WG Minutes - 2011-03-01 (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: DELETE templates and blank nodes. (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Draft answer KK-7 (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Fwd: Re: Planning SIP service as replacement for FR/UK Zakim dial-in numbers (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Friday, 18 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions (Tuesday, 15 February)
• response to GR (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* (Thursday, 10 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: 2011-02-08 SPARQL TC Agenda (Monday, 7 February)
• SELECT expressions tests are OK (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: Names (long and short) for JSON results doc (Thursday, 27 January)
• Re: Updated editors draft of HTTP RDF Update specification (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: what are COUNT, MIN, MAX, etc.? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Pre-LC review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Tuesday, 25 January)
• entailment profiles? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• what are COUNT, MIN, MAX, etc.? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Postponed Issues (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: BIND tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011 (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: BIND tests (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: BIND tests (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Update Protocol messages (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Update Protocol messages (Monday, 24 January)
• BIND tests (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification (Sunday, 23 January)
• Re: Review of Service Description Draft (Friday, 21 January)
• Re: new version of fed query (Friday, 21 January)
• Pre-LC review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description (Friday, 21 January)
• SPARQL telecon agenda for 2011-Jan-18 (Monday, 17 January)
• Generating tests [was: Re: Review SPARQL Query?] (Sunday, 16 January)
• Today's SPARQL WG *Cancelled* (Tuesday, 4 January)
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 (Monday, 3 January)
• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly (Monday, 3 January)

Matthew Perry

• Re: Query Document Review (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Monday, 28 March)
• RE: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation (Tuesday, 22 March)
• New Property Path Tests (Friday, 18 March)
• Query Document Review (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Test cases for approval (Wednesday, 2 March)
• New property path tests (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review of revised property path tests (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Review of revised property path tests (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Reviewing the GeoSPARQL document? (Saturday, 26 February)
• Review of revised property path tests (Monday, 21 February)
• Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc (Monday, 21 February)
• PP Tests (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* (Thursday, 10 February)
• Comments on Entailment Regimes from Zhe Wu (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 1 February)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths (Wednesday, 26 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)

Nicholas Humfrey

• Re: Questions about SPARQL 1.1 service description (Thursday, 24 February)
• Questions about SPARQL 1.1 service description (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Friday, 18 February)
• RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol: Priority of the '?default' query component (Thursday, 17 February)
• RedStore tests for the Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Apologies (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Regrets (Monday, 31 January)
• Calling the US from the UK (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Regrets (Tuesday, 4 January)

Nico Michaelis

• Review of Service Description Draft (Thursday, 13 January)

Olivier Corby

• Review test cases (Monday, 28 March)
• Test cases for exists (Monday, 14 February)
• Aggregates test case (Monday, 14 February)
• at risk for today (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) (Thursday, 3 February)
• regrets (Tuesday, 4 January)

Paul Gearon

• Re: Update comment (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Update comment (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Update comment (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions (Tuesday, 15 March)
• apologies (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Executing the decision on blank bodes in DELETE (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 17 February)
• Apologies (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Draft response to HK-2 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Draft response to HK-2 (Monday, 7 February)
• Re: Notice of *possible* regrets (Monday, 31 January)
• Notice of *possible* regrets (Monday, 31 January)
• Re: Names (long and short) for JSON results doc (Friday, 28 January)
• JSON result serialization revue (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial (Tuesday, 18 January)
• Apologies (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly (Tuesday, 4 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Tuesday, 4 January)

Polleres, Axel

• SPARQL Query review (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Comment on Dataset-UNION (Wednesday, 23 February)
• Re: FYI: Implementing SPARQL 1.1 Query - first findings (Saturday, 5 February)
• Regrets (Tuesday, 4 January)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Kjeti;'s open comments (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: SPARQL TC 2011-02-15 Agenda (Tuesday, 15 February)
• rendering rfc 2119 keywords (Sunday, 6 February)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 (Tuesday, 4 January)

Souripriya Das

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)

SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-66: Should there be an ORDER BY for aggregates, particularly GROUP_CONCAT (Tuesday, 15 February)
• ISSUE-65: Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string? (Tuesday, 25 January)

Steve Harris

• Re: [TTL] Long literals (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: [TTL] Long literals (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Query Document Review (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Draft response JB-2 (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 29, 2011 (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: SPARQL Query review (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Update comment (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Re: Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review (Monday, 28 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Agenda 2011-02-22 (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) (Tuesday, 22 February)
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 (Thursday, 17 February)
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: response to GR (Tuesday, 15 February)
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 (Monday, 14 February)
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions (Friday, 11 February)
• Aggregation Set Functions (Friday, 11 February)
• Re: Service or graph store naming. (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Draft response to GK-1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Response to DBeckett-1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Response to DBeckett-1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Response to DBeckett-1 (Tuesday, 8 February)
• Re: Names (long and short) for JSON results doc (Friday, 28 January)
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: what are COUNT, MIN, MAX, etc.? (Tuesday, 25 January)
• Re: Update Protocol messages (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Update Protocol messages (Monday, 24 January)
• Update Protocol messages (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification (Monday, 24 January)
• Re: Review SPARQL Query? (Thursday, 13 January)
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 11 January)
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is (Tuesday, 11 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2011 09:20:58 UTC