- From: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuil@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:29:17 -0300
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 01/03/2011 8:31, Axel Polleres wrote: > On 1 Mar 2011, at 10:53, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote: > >> On 01/03/2011 7:31, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> Similar to Lee, the definition in 3.2 honestly doesn't make much sense to me. >>> What is ep(i) ? >> ep(is) is a function that retrieves the graph pointed by the URI i > from where and how? "i" should be the endpoint address, so we get access to that graph >>> you define eval(D(G), ep(i)) as D[i] >> what I meant is that the evaluation ep(i) returns a graph (this is what >> I wanted to say here eval(D(G), ep(i)) = D[i]) but indeed I was mistaken. >>> ep(i) is not defined, but I assume it shall return a graph? >>> but then in the next definition you call >>> >>> eval(D(ep(i)), P_1) >> Then, in eval(D(ep(i)), P_1) what I mean is that I evaluate the pattern >> P_1 in the graph returned by ep(i) >>> either there's some overloading on the function ep() ongoing here, or I don't understand what's actually going on here. Then you write "if i in dom(ep)" where dom(ep) is not defined. >> what I meant here is that i has to be an URI, if it is not, it should return the empty set > I still don't get it, to be honest with you :-( ok, if I can't explain it properly, maybe we can use the other definition. >>> For now, I am more leaning towards dropping 3.2 and getting 3.1 straight, following the comments we gave. >>> >> I can try to rephrase it, and if you still do not like it I will drop it. > I prefer whatever brings us faster to a working definition. :-) ok, we can decide today in the call, I will drop whatever we do not like and I will work in the other section > Seriously, there were problems with and comments on 3.1 as well... are these addressed already? no, I will address them during this week, sorry for this delay. > Thanks for your efforts, best, > Axel > >> cheers, >> >> Carlos >>> best, >>> Axel >>> >>> On 1 Mar 2011, at 10:12, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote: >>
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 14:29:47 UTC