Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1

On 2/17/2011 11:29 AM, Paul Gearon wrote:
>> I'm not inclined to revisit this decision at this point in time. Please let
>> me know if you see something significantly new and would like the working
>> group to consider it.
>
> Well it does appear that the issues were considered. I suppose I'm not
> going to create a roadblock for the working group at this late stage,
> but I think it's a bad idea. This email can serve as a record that I
> strongly object to this resolution.

Hi Paul,

Could you please clarify if you'd like this to be treated as a formal 
objection when the update document transitions to CR?

Lee

Received on Friday, 18 February 2011 03:06:13 UTC