- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:40:18 +0000
- To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Yup, me too. - Steve On 2011-01-28, at 17:03, Paul Gearon wrote: > I like #2 as well. > > Paul > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: >> I prefer option 2. >> >> Lee >> >> On 1/26/2011 7:13 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>> As a Note it is: >>> >>> "Serializing SPARQL Query Results in JSON" >>> Short name: /rdf-sparql-json-res/ >>> >>> In choosing doc names so far, we have tended to use "SPARQL 1.1" >>> terminology. >>> >>> Suggestions for the REC-track version of the JSON results: >>> >>> 1 - Keep it the same full name and short name as the Note >>> >>> 2 - "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format" >>> /sparql11-results-json/ >>> (and redirect from old 'latest' link?) >>> >>> 3 - other ... >>> >>> For reference: The XML version is >>> "SPARQL Query Results XML Format" >>> /rdf-sparql-XMLres/ >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >> >> > -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 18:40:54 UTC