public-owl-wg@w3.org from August 2008 by date

Friday, 29 August 2008

• RE: ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the profiles document, ISSUE-116) Boris Motik
• RE: ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the profiles document, ISSUE-116) Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-144 (Zhe): missing base triple in serialization of axioms with annotations. OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: XML Syntax: Attributes Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 28 August 2008

• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) Alan Ruttenberg
• Proposal to resolve Issue-130, Issue-131 and Issue-116 Ian Horrocks
• Re: XML Syntax: Attributes Sandro Hawke
• Re: XML Syntax: Attributes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• XML Syntax: Attributes Bijan Parsia
• ACTION 152 (Full Semantics): Editor's Draft ready for WG-internal Review Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) Bijan Parsia
• Re: encoding specification in the syntax document? Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) Boris Motik
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 27 August 2008

• URGENT: F2F4, Mandelieu (near Cannes), France, 23-24 October 2008 Ian Horrocks
• ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the profiles document, ISSUE-116) Boris Motik
• ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) Boris Motik
• RE: encoding specification in the syntax document? Boris Motik
• Re: encoding specification in the syntax document? Ian Horrocks
• RE: missing entry in table Michael Schneider
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Ivan Herman
• Re: missing entry in table Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Bijan Parsia
• RE: XML schema comments Boris Motik
• Re: XML schema comments Bijan Parsia
• Re: XML schema comments Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Bijan Parsia
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Jie Bao
• Re: XML schema comments Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: XML schema comments Boris Motik
• Re: XML schema comments Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: missing entry in table Boris Motik
• RE: missing entry in table Michael Schneider
• missing entry in table Michael Schneider
• RE: XML schema comments Boris Motik
• XML schema comments Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: encoding specification in the syntax document? Ivan Herman
• RE: encoding specification in the syntax document? Boris Motik

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

• Agenda TC 27/08/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• encoding specification in the syntax document? Ivan Herman
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") Bijan Parsia
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") Ivan Herman
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") Ivan Herman

Monday, 25 August 2008

• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") Jim Hendler
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") Ian Horrocks
• Re: On the functionalities of the OWL RL profile Ivan Herman
• Re: On the functionalities of the OWL RL profile Ian Horrocks
• On the functionalities of the OWL RL profile Ivan Herman
• Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance Ian Horrocks
• Re: minutes of Aug 20 Ivan Herman

Sunday, 24 August 2008

• ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification" Ian Horrocks
• minutes of Aug 20 Sandro Hawke
• Re: (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 22 August 2008

• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 21 August 2008

• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• OWL Integrity Constraints Survey -- Please participate Kendall Clark
• HTML quick start (Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility) Bijan Parsia
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• an extreme example of a "punning" ontology Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Support for OWL 2? Rinke Hoekstra

Wednesday, 20 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-136 (owl:members): Implemented resolution for OWL 2 Full (only) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• change to Primer re: resolution of ISSUE-111 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• actions resulting from resolution of ISSUE-16 (annotations on annotations) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-136 (owl:members): Implemented resolution for OWL 2 Full (only) Michael Schneider
• Re: editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-118 (anonymous individual semantics) Boris Motik
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Uli Sattler
• Re: editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime Michael Smith
• editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Ian Horrocks
• proposal to resolve ISSUE-141 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Any pending modifications to XML syntax? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position Ivan Herman
• Any pending modifications to XML syntax? Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position Michael Schneider
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Ivan Herman
• Re: Fwd: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position Ivan Herman
• Fwd: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec Jie Bao
• Re: Primer multiple syntaxes (process + gui coordination) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Jie Bao
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility Jie Bao

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

• primer gui Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 Michael Schneider
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-118 (anonymous individual semantics) Boris Motik
• Primer multiple syntaxes (process + gui coordination) Sandro Hawke
• Re: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 Michael Smith
• RE: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position Boris Motik
• Re: Delay in finishing the OWL 2 Full Editor's Draft Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Bijan Parsia
• Re: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Bijan Parsia
• Agenda TC 20/08/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Bijan Parsia
• Re: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Bijan Parsia
• RE: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Re: Delay in finishing the OWL 2 Full Editor's Draft Alan Wu
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Action 195 Look in to what happens with OWL-R ruleset applied to annotation properties with subproperty axioms Alan Ruttenberg
• Delay in finishing the OWL 2 Full Editor's Draft Michael Schneider
• RE: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 Michael Schneider

Monday, 18 August 2008

• Re: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

• ACTION-177 (implement resolution of the datatypes issue, ISSUE-126) has been completed Boris Motik
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-16 by adding annotations on annotations Alan Ruttenberg
• proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 18 August 2008

• RE: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Re: changes to Syntax document to implement the resolution of ISSUE-104 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Ian Horrocks
• RE: ISSUE-143 (profileannotation): No Annotations in any of the profiles? Boris Motik

Sunday, 17 August 2008

• ISSUE-143 (profileannotation): No Annotations in any of the profiles? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 16 August 2008

• RE: ISSUE-142 (Rdlrelation): Problems with statement re: relationship between OWL-RL DL and OWL-RL Full Boris Motik

Friday, 15 August 2008

• ISSUE-142 (Rdlrelation): Problems with statement re: relationship between OWL-RL DL and OWL-RL Full OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks
• Re: Editorial bug in the EL profile? Markus Krötzsch
• Re: Editorial bug in the EL profile? Evren Sirin
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ivan Herman

Thursday, 14 August 2008

• Re: Editorial bug in the EL profile? Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Kendall Clark
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Kendall Clark
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks
• Re: Minutes 2008-08-13 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Minutes 2008-08-13 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-140 (Named Property Chains): Allow (macro-like) shorthands for directly referring to property chains (instead of their superproperty) Rinke Hoekstra
• ISSUE-140 (Named Property Chains): Allow (macro-like) shorthands for directly referring to property chains (instead of their superproperty) OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Minutes 2008-08-13 Rinke Hoekstra

Wednesday, 13 August 2008

• ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 Michael Schneider
• changes to Syntax document to implement the resolution of ISSUE-104 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• changes to RDF mapping to implement the resolution of ISSUE-135 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION 165 (Investigate easy keys in dl-lite) Ian Horrocks
• Re: ACTION 162 (Investigate top/bottom roles in dl-lite) Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Jim Hendler
• RE: Editorial bug in the EL profile? Boris Motik
• RE: ACTION-165 (Investigate easy keys in dl-lite) and ACTION-162 (Investigate top/bottom roles in dl-lite) Boris Motik
• Editorial bug in the EL profile? Evren Sirin
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Ivan Herman
• ACTION 165 (Investigate easy keys in dl-lite) Diego Calvanese
• ACTION 162 (Investigate top/bottom roles in dl-lite) Diego Calvanese
• RE: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Michael Schneider
• RE: What is added by functional syntax? Boris Motik
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

• RE: What is added by functional syntax? Boris Motik
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? Evan Wallace
• annotations (was Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: What is added by functional syntax? Conrad Bock
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Alan Ruttenberg
• What is added by functional syntax? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Issue-104 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Alan Wu
• RE: Issue-104 Michael Schneider
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Issue-104 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks
• Issue-104 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Alan Ruttenberg
• Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks
• RE: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ivan Herman
• RE: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Ian Horrocks
• RE: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks

Monday, 11 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Jim Hendler
• RE: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Michael Schneider

Monday, 11 August 2008

• proposal to close ISSUE-16 by adding annotations on annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-139 (ManchesterSyntaxNote): Manchester Syntax for OWL 1.1 OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? Michael Schneider
• Fwd: IMPORTANT: Publication schedule and reviewing Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Ian Horrocks

Sunday, 10 August 2008

• ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment Michael Schneider

Saturday, 9 August 2008

• ISSUE-129 Proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks
• ISSUE-104 Proposal to resolve Ian Horrocks

Friday, 8 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Jim Hendler
• ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve Ian Horrocks
• RE: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Michael Schneider

Thursday, 7 August 2008

• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 8 August 2008

• ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems Michael Schneider

Thursday, 7 August 2008

• Re: Data stuff Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Ian Horrocks

Wednesday, 6 August 2008

• mailing list for rdf:text (owl:internationalizedString) Sandro Hawke
• ACTION-169 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype Christine Golbreich
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Telecons and scribing Ian Horrocks
• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Bijan Parsia
• More on Publication schedule and reviewing Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Alan Wu
• More on Publication schedule and reviewing Ian Horrocks
• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Jim Hendler
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Michael Smith

Tuesday, 5 August 2008

• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Bijan Parsia
• RE: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Conrad Bock
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Conrad Bock
• Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.06 Ian Horrocks
• Agenda TC 06/08/2008 Héctor Pérez-Urbina
• RE: IMPORTANT: Publication schedule and reviewing Michael Schneider
• IMPORTANT: Publication schedule and reviewing Ian Horrocks
• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 4 August 2008

• RE: Proposal for datatypes at 3F2F Michael Schneider
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Ian Horrocks
• ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Ian Horrocks
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Bijan Parsia
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Ian Horrocks
• RE: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Michael Schneider
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Michael Schneider
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Evan Wallace
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG Michael Schneider
• RE: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 Michael Schneider
• Re: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 Sandro Hawke
• Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 Ian Horrocks
• Resolution of ISSUE-132 ("constant" -> "literal") implemented Boris Motik

Sunday, 3 August 2008

• Re: ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 1 August 2008

• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 Diego Calvanese

Last message date: Friday, 29 August 2008 21:16:59 UTC