Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility

No particular comment at this time, just a note that I like this
thing:-) But I am not sure how we could also produce an HTML version of
this...

Ivan

Jie Bao wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> There is an update draft of the OWL 2 quicl reference guide  at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/images/8/8e/Owl2-refcard_2008-08-19.pdf
> 
> Please note that draft is yet incomplete. As some naming issues are
> pending, there are terms with the "?" mark
> 
> Comments are welcome.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jie (representing Elisa, Deborah and Evan)
> 
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com> wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> I exchanged email with Li Ding, who originally created the semantic web card
>> you've referenced, below.  He provided the original MS Word version we can
>> use as a starting point - will email Ivan off list on migrating that to some
>> other form so that we can "play with it".
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Elisa
>>
>> Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>>
>>> Conversation with Ivan:
>>>
>>> Alan:
>>> There's some interest in having something like a quick reference  card.
>>> Formatting/typesetting of this card would be important, in  order to have it
>>> fit on the page, etc. However Peter pointed out that  this may not be to the
>>> W3C's liking for reasons of accessibility,  viewing on any device, etc, so I
>>> was tasked with an action to ask you  about what guidelines are with respect
>>> to this.
>>>
>>> There's a semantic web one that someone produced that is inspiration.
>>>  http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/94/
>>> Basically we're still trying to avoid a situation where we create
>>>  redundant documents. This  would be a creative way of handling an
>>>  important function of the overview  and there was general agreement  in the
>>> UFDTF that this sort of thing is useful.
>>>
>>> Ivan:
>>>
>>> AFAIK, such cards have been produced before both for OWL and SPARQL  (but
>>> I may be wrong). But never as an 'official' W3C deliverable.
>>>
>>> Peter is right that there would be quite a problem with W3C producing  a
>>> W3C recommendation or any other document in PDF (only). If somebody  could
>>> come up with a clever way of achieving the same effect with CSS  (and then
>>> have it in forms of PDF, too), well, that could work.  Otherwise we keep it
>>> non-official.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf