- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 14:28:43 +0200
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "Ian Horrocks" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-owl-wg Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0AD9189@judith.fzi.de>
>-----Original Message----- >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Sandro Hawke >Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:11 PM >To: Ian Horrocks >Cc: public-owl-wg Group WG >Subject: Re: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 > > > >> I am a bit confused by [1] , because (a) we talk about xs:float >> instead of xsd:float, > >My understanding is that's stylistic. I tend to prefer "xs". See >http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/10/08/qanda.html > >(I've often wondered if there's more to the story than that, but I >haven't tried to find out.) > > -- Sandro In XML documents one normally defines the namespace prefixes within the root tag, and one is completely free which one to use for a given namespace URI. I think people often prefer "xs" simply because it's a character less to write/read. For our purposes, however, I suggest to really use "xsd:" to make clear that we talk about XSD. Also note that we use "xsd:" for facets. Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 12:29:24 UTC