- From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:25:41 +0100
- To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Regards,
Héctor
---
* Admin (20 min)
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments?
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (6 August)
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
# Action 171 Analyze and comment on
Annotation_System_2 / Boris Motik
# Action 176 Draft a comment on XML Schema
Datatypes 1.1 draft / Peter Patel-Schneider
+ Due and overdue Actions
# Action 162 Investigate top/bottom roles in
dl-lite / Diego Calvanese
# Action 165 Investigate easy keys in dl-lite /
Diego Calvanese
# Action 170 Analyze and comment on
Annotation_System_2 / Bijan Parsia
# Action 168 Test our documents for
accessibility with Robert Stevens / Bijan Parsia
# Action 173 Investigate Boris' IEEE reference,
re linking floating point to real numbers / Alan Ruttenberg
# Action 174 Provide an rdf serialization for
his rich annotation proposal / Bijan Parsia
# Action 157 Confer with chairs list about how
to get more information about what we need to do re: accessibility /
Alan Ruttenberg
# Action 178 Clarify what ISSUE-116 is about,
considering splitting to clarify / Michael Schneider
* Issues (25 minutes) - Address as many as possible during allocated time
o Proposals to Resolve Issues
+ Issue 111 (There's no way to signal the intended
semantics of an OWL document), per email
+ Issue 104 (OWL 1.1 DL does not have a disallowed
vocabulary), per email
+ Issue 129 (Desirable to have rdf:list vocabulary
available for use in modeling in OWL 2), per email
+ Issue 135 (Should be able to import rdf serialized
documents without ontology headers), per email
o Other Issue Discussions
+ Issue 133 DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA
+ Issue 109 What is the namespace for elements and
attributes in the XML serialization?
+ Issue 130 Conformance, warnings, errors
+ Issue 118 Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential
or skolem semantics?
+ Issue 114 Which combinations of punning should be allowed?
+ Issue 134 Metamodel for OWL 2
+ Issue 136 Allow the use of owl:members with owl:AllDifferent
+ Issue 137 Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces
incompatibility with OWL 1
+ Issue 138 Name of dateTime datatype
* General Discussion
* Additional other business (5 min)
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 16:26:22 UTC