- From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:25:41 +0100
- To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Regards, Héctor --- * Admin (20 min) o Roll call o Agenda amendments? o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (6 August) o Action items status + Pending Review Actions # Action 171 Analyze and comment on Annotation_System_2 / Boris Motik # Action 176 Draft a comment on XML Schema Datatypes 1.1 draft / Peter Patel-Schneider + Due and overdue Actions # Action 162 Investigate top/bottom roles in dl-lite / Diego Calvanese # Action 165 Investigate easy keys in dl-lite / Diego Calvanese # Action 170 Analyze and comment on Annotation_System_2 / Bijan Parsia # Action 168 Test our documents for accessibility with Robert Stevens / Bijan Parsia # Action 173 Investigate Boris' IEEE reference, re linking floating point to real numbers / Alan Ruttenberg # Action 174 Provide an rdf serialization for his rich annotation proposal / Bijan Parsia # Action 157 Confer with chairs list about how to get more information about what we need to do re: accessibility / Alan Ruttenberg # Action 178 Clarify what ISSUE-116 is about, considering splitting to clarify / Michael Schneider * Issues (25 minutes) - Address as many as possible during allocated time o Proposals to Resolve Issues + Issue 111 (There's no way to signal the intended semantics of an OWL document), per email + Issue 104 (OWL 1.1 DL does not have a disallowed vocabulary), per email + Issue 129 (Desirable to have rdf:list vocabulary available for use in modeling in OWL 2), per email + Issue 135 (Should be able to import rdf serialized documents without ontology headers), per email o Other Issue Discussions + Issue 133 DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA + Issue 109 What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization? + Issue 130 Conformance, warnings, errors + Issue 118 Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential or skolem semantics? + Issue 114 Which combinations of punning should be allowed? + Issue 134 Metamodel for OWL 2 + Issue 136 Allow the use of owl:members with owl:AllDifferent + Issue 137 Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 + Issue 138 Name of dateTime datatype * General Discussion * Additional other business (5 min)
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 16:26:22 UTC