Re: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3

> I am a bit confused by [1] , because (a) we talk about xs:float  
> instead of xsd:float,

My understanding is that's stylistic.  I tend to prefer "xs".  See
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/10/08/qanda.html

(I've often wondered if there's more to the story than that, but I
haven't tried to find out.)

      -- Sandro

Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 12:11:57 UTC