- From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:15:16 +0200
- To: "'Michael Schneider'" <schneid@fzi.de>
- Cc: "'W3C OWL Working Group'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hello, Thanks for the comment -- I've updated the document. Regards, Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Schneider [mailto:schneid@fzi.de] > Sent: 29 August 2008 17:44 > To: Boris Motik > Cc: W3C OWL Working Group > Subject: RE: ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the profiles document, > ISSUE-116) > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] > >On Behalf Of Boris Motik > >Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:57 PM > >To: 'W3C OWL Working Group' > >Subject: ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the > >profiles document, ISSUE-116) > > > > > >Hello, > > > >I've just completed my ACTION-204; that is, I've added a note to the > >Profiles document about the axiomatic triples. Here is the > >diff: > > > >http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Profiles&diff=11951&oldi > >d=11947 > > > >Should you prefer to just look at the document, the statement is at the > >end of the rule list, immediately before Theorem 1. Please > >let me know should you have any comments. > > > >Regards, > > > > Boris > > > > Hi, Boris! > > Is it right that by "the RDF semantics" you refer to the *document*, not to > the *language* RDF? The former would make sense, since the document contains > the axiomatic triples of the languages RDF *and* RDFS. > > In order to avoid misunderstandings, I suggest to explicitly talk about the > "RDF semantics document", or alternatively about "RDF and RDFS". > > Cheers, > Michael
Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 21:16:59 UTC