- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:58:45 +0100
- To: public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
NOTE: please look at / review F2F3 minutes -- you will be asked to
approve them (or not)
Teleconference.2008.08.06/Agenda
Call in details
When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,
Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
* Date of Call: Wednesday August 6, 2008
* Time of Call: 1700 UTC, 10:00 (West US), 13:00 (East US),
18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
* Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
* Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
* IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
* Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
* Duration: 90 minutes
* Chair: Ian Horrocks
* Scribe: Bernardo Cuenca Grau (Scribe List)
* Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.
2008.08.06/Agenda
Agenda
* Admin (20 min)
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments?
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (23 July)
o PROPOSED: Accept Boston F2F Minutes Day 1 (28 July) and
Day 2 (29 July)
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
# Action 171 Analyze and comment on
Annotation_System_2 / Boris Motik
# Action 175 Report back on names frameworks,
naming options / Sandro Hawke
# Action 190 Send email to WG about review
responsibilities for forthcoming working drafts / Ian Horrocks
# Action 191 Solicit RPI reviews of key
documents / Jie Bao
# Action 176 Draft a comment on XML Schema
Datatypes 1.1 draft / Peter Patel-Schneider
+ Due and overdue Actions
# Action 162 Investigate top/bottom roles in
dl-lite / Diego Calvanese
# Action 165 Investigate easy keys in dl-
lite / Diego Calvanese
# Action 150 Initiate discussion with RIF WG
and try to reach consensus / Jie Bao
# Action 170 Analyze and comment on
Annotation_System_2 / Bijan Parsia
# Action 169 Ask Deb about nesting level of
annotations on annotations / Alan Ruttenberg
# Action 168 Test our documents for
accessibility with Robert Stevens / Bijan Parsia
# Action 173 Investigate Boris' IEEE
reference, re linking floating point to real numbers / Alan Ruttenberg
# Action 174 Provide an rdf serialization for
his rich annotation proposal / Bijan Parsia
# Action 178 Clarify what ISSUE-116 is about,
considering splitting to clarify / Michael Schneider
* Outcomes of and actions from Boston F2F (40 min)
o Datatypes
+ Issue 132 (Replace usage of "constant" with
"literal" as defined by RDF and XML) resolved as per Boris's email
+ Issue 126 (The list of normative datatypes should
be revisited) resolved as per Boris's email
# We will use owl:real(Plus) as the name for
the real numberline (plus "extra" values)
# The value spaces of xsd:float and xsd:double
will be a subset of the value space of owl:realPlus (real numbers
plus +/- inf, +/- zero, NaN). They will be discrete points in that
space in line with XML Schema
# Decision on rational postponed pending
decision on N-ary (don't need rational if we don't have N-ary)
# xsd:dateTime interpreted as XML Schema 1.1
time line; mandatory time zone for constants (applications may apply
non-standard repairs); need to decide if this will be called
xsd:dateTime or owl:dateTime (see strawpoll)
# Structural equivalence of literals based on
syntactic form
o Annotations
+ Bijan and Peter will produce a "specification
standard" document by August 20th.
+ Possible alternative based on Alan's proposal and
Boris and Peter's paper
o Profiles
+ Issue 108 (Need to name the OWL Profiles); see
proposal to resolve
+ Issue 131 (We should unify OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full
profiles); see strawpoll
+ Issue 111 (There's no way to signal the intended
semantics of an OWL document); see strawpoll
o N-ary
+ Bijan (?) will produce a "specification standard"
document describing N-ary datatypes (see strawpoll)
+ WG will decide how much of this doc to include in
main spec (from zero to all)
+ Anything left in N-ary document will be
"optional" (roughly: MAY be supported; if supported SHOULD be as per
this doc)
o OWL Full
+ Already have a good draft of RDF-based Semantics;
will be frozen for review by 19th August
+ Reviews from Jie, Peter and Zhe by 22nd August
+ Resolved to publish on or around 1st September
o MOF Metamodel (see slides)
+ Generally liked, but some issues need more thought
+ Probably add it an an appendix to the syntax document
o User Facing Documents
+ Reviewed snapshot of Quick Reference; still
incomplete and not in card format
# Deb and Elisa to produce reasonably complete
PDF by first week of September
+ Reviewed first draft of Requirements
# Good progress made; Vipul, Evan, Christine
and Jie to update (making shorter and tighter) within four weeks
o Test Cases
+ Some changes to test types needed (e.g., profiles
tests)
+ Hope to have OWL-1 tests imported into wiki within
2-3 weeks
o Manchester syntax
+ Idea is to publish as a note (not rec track)
o Publication Schedule
+ On or about 15th September, publish new public
working drafts of core docs, including: Syntax, Semantics, RDF-based
Semantics, Mapping to RDF, Profiles, XML Syntax
# plus, maybe, Primer, other UFDs
+ Reviews needed of all the above documents
# reviews due by 8 September
+ Goal is to transition to last call at Cannes F2F
in late October
* Issues (25 minutes) - Address as many as possible during
allocated time
o Proposals to Resolve Issues
+ Issue 108 Need to name the OWL Profiles; per email
o Other Issue Discussions
+ Issue 133 DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA
+ Issue 109 What is the namespace for elements and
attributes in the XML serialization?
+ Issue 130 Conformance, warnings, errors
+ Issue 104 OWL 1.1 DL does not have a disallowed
vocabulary
+ Issue 118 Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have
existential or skolem semantics?
+ Issue 129 Desirable to have rdf:list vocabulary
available for use in modeling in OWL 2
* General Discussion
* Additional other business (5 min)
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2008 16:59:56 UTC