From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:13:24 -0400 > I clarified in the issue description that A imports B. > -Alan > > On Aug 2, 2008, at 10:02 PM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > > ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces > >incompatibility with OWL 1 > > > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/137 > > > > Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg > > On product: > > > > In OWL 1 one could have Ontology A, B with > > > > A: :foo rdf:type rdfs:Class > > B: :foo rdf:type owl:Class > > > > In OWL 2, A would be rejected as syntactically invalid because no > > part of the reverse mapping handles the single triple with rdfs:Class > > > > An analogous situation arises with rdf:Property This issue has been sitting for a while with no action. I propose that this issue be closed by noting the incompatibility. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs ResearchReceived on Thursday, 21 August 2008 16:18:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:51 UTC