- From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:08:07 -0400
- To: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Alan: I don't know whether it is already settled or not: for the pdf concern, we might publish it as a picture, e.g., in gif or png. High printing quality may be achieved with a reasonably small file size. Jie On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Conversation with Ivan: > > Alan: > There's some interest in having something like a quick reference card. > Formatting/typesetting of this card would be important, in order to have it > fit on the page, etc. However Peter pointed out that this may not be to the > W3C's liking for reasons of accessibility, viewing on any device, etc, so I > was tasked with an action to ask you about what guidelines are with respect > to this. > > There's a semantic web one that someone produced that is inspiration. > http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/94/ > Basically we're still trying to avoid a situation where we create redundant > documents. This would be a creative way of handling an important function > of the overview and there was general agreement in the UFDTF that this sort > of thing is useful. > > Ivan: > > AFAIK, such cards have been produced before both for OWL and SPARQL (but I > may be wrong). But never as an 'official' W3C deliverable. > > Peter is right that there would be quite a problem with W3C producing a W3C > recommendation or any other document in PDF (only). If somebody could come > up with a clever way of achieving the same effect with CSS (and then have it > in forms of PDF, too), well, that could work. Otherwise we keep it > non-official. > > -Alan > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 04:08:43 UTC