- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:43:21 +0100
- To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Aug 26, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > In fact we did *not* deprecate OWL Lite. This was ISSUE-107, > resolved as per Alan's email [1]. > > -Rinke > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/ > 0308.html Plus there is text in the primer: <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Primer#OWL_1_Species> I prefer that the profiles document didn't mention OWL Lite at all, but a bit in the beginning pointing out the connection is harmless. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 08:44:03 UTC