public-owl-wg@w3.org from August 2008 by author

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Thursday, 21 August)
• editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Action 195 Look in to what happens with OWL-R ruleset applied to annotation properties with subproperty axioms (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-16 by adding annotations on annotations (Tuesday, 19 August)
• proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• What is added by functional syntax? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Issue-104 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Issue-104 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Sunday, 3 August)

Alan Wu

• Re: Delay in finishing the OWL 2 Full Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Wednesday, 6 August)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: XML Syntax: Attributes (Friday, 29 August)
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) (Friday, 29 August)
• XML Syntax: Attributes (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") (Tuesday, 26 August)
• HTML quick start (Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility) (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Primer multiple syntaxes (process + gui coordination) (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 (Monday, 4 August)

Boris Motik

• RE: ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the profiles document, ISSUE-116) (Friday, 29 August)
• RE: ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) (Thursday, 28 August)
• ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the profiles document, ISSUE-116) (Wednesday, 27 August)
• ACTION-203 done (resolution of ISSUE-118 - semantics of anonymous individuals) (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: encoding specification in the syntax document? (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: missing entry in table (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: encoding specification in the syntax document? (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-118 (anonymous individual semantics) (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-118 (anonymous individual semantics) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? (Tuesday, 19 August)
• ACTION-177 (implement resolution of the datatypes issue, ISSUE-126) has been completed (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: ISSUE-143 (profileannotation): No Annotations in any of the profiles? (Monday, 18 August)
• RE: ISSUE-142 (Rdlrelation): Problems with statement re: relationship between OWL-RL DL and OWL-RL Full (Saturday, 16 August)
• RE: Editorial bug in the EL profile? (Wednesday, 13 August)
• RE: ACTION-165 (Investigate easy keys in dl-lite) and ACTION-162 (Investigate top/bottom roles in dl-lite) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• RE: What is added by functional syntax? (Wednesday, 13 August)
• RE: What is added by functional syntax? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Resolution of ISSUE-132 ("constant" -> "literal") implemented (Monday, 4 August)

Carsten Lutz

• Re: Editorial bug in the EL profile? (Thursday, 14 August)

Christine Golbreich

• Re: ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype (Wednesday, 6 August)

Conrad Bock

• RE: What is added by functional syntax? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• RE: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Tuesday, 5 August)

Deborah L. McGuinness

• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Wednesday, 13 August)

Diego Calvanese

• ACTION 165 (Investigate easy keys in dl-lite) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• ACTION 162 (Investigate top/bottom roles in dl-lite) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Friday, 1 August)

Evan Wallace

• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)

Evren Sirin

• Re: Editorial bug in the EL profile? (Friday, 15 August)
• Editorial bug in the EL profile? (Wednesday, 13 August)

Héctor Pérez-Urbina

• Agenda TC 27/08/2008 (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Agenda TC 20/08/2008 (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Agenda TC 06/08/2008 (Tuesday, 5 August)

Ian Horrocks

• Proposal to resolve Issue-130, Issue-131 and Issue-116 (Thursday, 28 August)
• URGENT: F2F4, Mandelieu (near Cannes), France, 23-24 October 2008 (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: encoding specification in the syntax document? (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: On the functionalities of the OWL RL profile (Monday, 25 August)
• ISSUE-130 / ACTION-194 Come up with a proposal for conformance (Monday, 25 August)
• ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification" (Sunday, 24 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: ACTION 165 (Investigate easy keys in dl-lite) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: ACTION 162 (Investigate top/bottom roles in dl-lite) (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Monday, 11 August)
• Fwd: IMPORTANT: Publication schedule and reviewing (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Monday, 11 August)
• ISSUE-129 Proposal to resolve (Saturday, 9 August)
• ISSUE-104 Proposal to resolve (Saturday, 9 August)
• ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Data stuff (Thursday, 7 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Thursday, 7 August)
• ACTION-169 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Telecons and scribing (Wednesday, 6 August)
• More on Publication schedule and reviewing (Wednesday, 6 August)
• More on Publication schedule and reviewing (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.06 (Tuesday, 5 August)
• IMPORTANT: Publication schedule and reviewing (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)
• Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 (Monday, 4 August)

Ivan Herman

• Re: encoding specification in the syntax document? (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: encoding specification in the syntax document? (Wednesday, 27 August)
• encoding specification in the syntax document? (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: On the functionalities of the OWL RL profile (Monday, 25 August)
• On the functionalities of the OWL RL profile (Monday, 25 August)
• Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: minutes of Aug 20 (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Fwd: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Friday, 15 August)
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)

Jie Bao

• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Fwd: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 20 August)

Jim Hendler

• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") (Monday, 25 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: What is added by functional syntax? (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Wednesday, 13 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Friday, 8 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Wednesday, 6 August)

Kendall Clark

• OWL Integrity Constraints Survey -- Please participate (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Thursday, 14 August)

Markus Krötzsch

• Re: Editorial bug in the EL profile? (Friday, 15 August)

Michael Schneider

• RE: ACTION-204 completed (add a note about axiomatic triples to the profiles document, ISSUE-116) (Friday, 29 August)
• ACTION 152 (Full Semantics): Editor's Draft ready for WG-internal Review (Thursday, 28 August)
• RE: missing entry in table (Wednesday, 27 August)
• RE: missing entry in table (Wednesday, 27 August)
• missing entry in table (Wednesday, 27 August)
• ISSUE-136 (owl:members): Implemented resolution for OWL 2 Full (only) (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position (Wednesday, 20 August)
• RE: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Delay in finishing the OWL 2 Full Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 (Tuesday, 19 August)
• RE: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Monday, 18 August)
• ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 (Wednesday, 13 August)
• RE: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Wednesday, 13 August)
• RE: Issue-104 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• RE: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• RE: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• RE: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• RE: ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Tuesday, 12 August)
• ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Monday, 11 August)
• ISSUE 131 (OWL R Unification): Different semantics on syntactic fragment (Sunday, 10 August)
• RE: AW: Peter's slides about the MOF metamodel (Friday, 8 August)
• ISSUE-131 (OWL R Unification): Fundamental understanding problems (Friday, 8 August)
• RE: IMPORTANT: Publication schedule and reviewing (Tuesday, 5 August)
• RE: Proposal for datatypes at 3F2F (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 (Monday, 4 August)

Michael Smith

• Re: editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: ACTION-193: Effort needed for implementing a resolution of ISSUE-136 (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Wednesday, 6 August)

OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-144 (Zhe): missing base triple in serialization of axioms with annotations. (Friday, 29 August)
• ISSUE-143 (profileannotation): No Annotations in any of the profiles? (Sunday, 17 August)
• ISSUE-142 (Rdlrelation): Problems with statement re: relationship between OWL-RL DL and OWL-RL Full (Friday, 15 August)
• ISSUE-141 (1subject): OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position (Friday, 15 August)
• ISSUE-140 (Named Property Chains): Allow (macro-like) shorthands for directly referring to property chains (instead of their superproperty) (Thursday, 14 August)
• ISSUE-139 (ManchesterSyntaxNote): Manchester Syntax for OWL 1.1 (Monday, 11 August)
• ISSUE-138 (dateTime): Name of dateTime datatype (Monday, 4 August)
• ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Sunday, 3 August)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: XML Syntax: Attributes (Thursday, 28 August)
• Re: missing entry in table (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 (Friday, 22 August)
• (compatibility) proposal to resolve ISSUE-137 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Friday, 22 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Thursday, 21 August)
• an extreme example of a "punning" ontology (Thursday, 21 August)
• proposal to close ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: ISSUE-136 (owl:members): Implemented resolution for OWL 2 Full (only) (Wednesday, 20 August)
• change to Primer re: resolution of ISSUE-111 (Wednesday, 20 August)
• actions resulting from resolution of ISSUE-16 (annotations on annotations) (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: editorial comments on http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime (Wednesday, 20 August)
• proposal to resolve ISSUE-141 (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Any pending modifications to XML syntax? (Wednesday, 20 August)
• primer gui (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: Delay in finishing the OWL 2 Full Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 19 August)
• Re: changes to Syntax document to implement the resolution of ISSUE-104 (Monday, 18 August)
• Re: Minutes 2008-08-13 (Thursday, 14 August)
• changes to Syntax document to implement the resolution of ISSUE-104 (Wednesday, 13 August)
• changes to RDF mapping to implement the resolution of ISSUE-135 (Wednesday, 13 August)
• annotations (was Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13) (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Issue-104 (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: ACTION-178: What is ISSUE-116 (Axiomatic Triples for OWL R) about? (Tuesday, 12 August)
• proposal to close ISSUE-16 by adding annotations on annotations (Monday, 11 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: draft of LC comment to XML Schema WG (Monday, 4 August)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• XML schema comments (Wednesday, 27 August)
• Re: Some editorial comments (Re: ISSUE-131: Preview of "unification") (Tuesday, 26 August)
• Re: Support for OWL 2? (Thursday, 21 August)
• Any pending modifications to XML syntax? (Wednesday, 20 August)
• Re: Minutes 2008-08-13 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: ISSUE-140 (Named Property Chains): Allow (macro-like) shorthands for directly referring to property chains (instead of their superproperty) (Thursday, 14 August)
• Minutes 2008-08-13 (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve (Tuesday, 12 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Wednesday, 6 August)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: XML Syntax: Attributes (Thursday, 28 August)
• minutes of Aug 20 (Sunday, 24 August)
• Primer multiple syntaxes (process + gui coordination) (Tuesday, 19 August)
• mailing list for rdf:text (owl:internationalizedString) (Wednesday, 6 August)
• Re: Resolution on datatypes at F2F3 (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: Proposal to resolve Issue-108 (Friday, 1 August)

Uli Sattler

• Re: Action-98 One page quick reference card / accessibility (Wednesday, 20 August)

Last message date: Friday, 29 August 2008 21:16:59 UTC