- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:47:48 -0400
- To: "Héctor Pérez-Urbina" <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I'm actually just ironing out some changes with Ian right now. Update soon. -Alan On Aug 12, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Héctor Pérez-Urbina wrote: > > Regards, > > Héctor > > --- > > * Admin (20 min) > o Roll call > o Agenda amendments? > o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (6 August) > o Action items status > + Pending Review Actions > # Action 171 Analyze and comment on > Annotation_System_2 / Boris Motik > # Action 176 Draft a comment on XML Schema > Datatypes 1.1 draft / Peter Patel-Schneider > + Due and overdue Actions > # Action 162 Investigate top/bottom roles in > dl-lite / Diego Calvanese > # Action 165 Investigate easy keys in dl-lite / > Diego Calvanese > # Action 170 Analyze and comment on > Annotation_System_2 / Bijan Parsia > # Action 168 Test our documents for > accessibility with Robert Stevens / Bijan Parsia > # Action 173 Investigate Boris' IEEE reference, > re linking floating point to real numbers / Alan Ruttenberg > # Action 174 Provide an rdf serialization for > his rich annotation proposal / Bijan Parsia > # Action 157 Confer with chairs list about how > to get more information about what we need to do re: accessibility / > Alan Ruttenberg > # Action 178 Clarify what ISSUE-116 is about, > considering splitting to clarify / Michael Schneider > * Issues (25 minutes) - Address as many as possible during > allocated time > o Proposals to Resolve Issues > + Issue 111 (There's no way to signal the intended > semantics of an OWL document), per email > + Issue 104 (OWL 1.1 DL does not have a disallowed > vocabulary), per email > + Issue 129 (Desirable to have rdf:list vocabulary > available for use in modeling in OWL 2), per email > + Issue 135 (Should be able to import rdf serialized > documents without ontology headers), per email > o Other Issue Discussions > + Issue 133 DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA > + Issue 109 What is the namespace for elements and > attributes in the XML serialization? > + Issue 130 Conformance, warnings, errors > + Issue 118 Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential > or skolem semantics? > + Issue 114 Which combinations of punning should be > allowed? > + Issue 134 Metamodel for OWL 2 > + Issue 136 Allow the use of owl:members with > owl:AllDifferent > + Issue 137 Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces > incompatibility with OWL 1 > + Issue 138 Name of dateTime datatype > * General Discussion > * Additional other business (5 min) >
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 16:48:37 UTC