- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:31:36 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 4 Aug 2008, at 13:11, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> I am a bit confused by [1] , because (a) we talk about xs:float >> instead of xsd:float, > > My understanding is that's stylistic. I tend to prefer "xs". See > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/10/08/qanda.html > > (I've often wondered if there's more to the story than that, but I > haven't tried to find out.) My experience and preference is xsd:, mostly because I tend to consult either the primer or the datatype spec :) RDF primer and semantics uses xsd: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/ http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/ As does guide, reference, etc., see: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 12:29:15 UTC