Re: ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1

I clarified in the issue description that A imports B.
-Alan

On Aug 2, 2008, at 10:02 PM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

>
>
> ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces  
> incompatibility with OWL 1
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/137
>
> Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg
> On product:
>
> In OWL 1 one could have Ontology A, B with
>
> A:  :foo rdf:type rdfs:Class
> B:  :foo rdf:type owl:Class
>
> In OWL 2, A  would be rejected as syntactically invalid because no  
> part of the reverse mapping handles the single triple with rdfs:Class
>
> An analogous situation arises with rdf:Property
>
>
>