Re: ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1

• From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
• Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:13:24 -0400
• To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <6D90E64E-6185-41A1-B395-641681227B3F@gmail.com>

I clarified in the issue description that A imports B.
-Alan

On Aug 2, 2008, at 10:02 PM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

>
>
> ISSUE-137 (rdfstypesbackward): Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces  
> incompatibility with OWL 1
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/137
>
> Raised by: Alan Ruttenberg
> On product:
>
> In OWL 1 one could have Ontology A, B with
>
> A:  :foo rdf:type rdfs:Class
> B:  :foo rdf:type owl:Class
>
> In OWL 2, A  would be rejected as syntactically invalid because no  
> part of the reverse mapping handles the single triple with rdfs:Class
>
> An analogous situation arises with rdf:Property
>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:14:04 UTC