Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13

The status is 

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Aug/0060.html

My view is that that is all that is required in the OWL 2 specification.

peter


From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:15:56 -0400

> On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:09 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> > From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13
> > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:43:40 -0400
> >
> >> General Discussion (40 minutes)
> >>    Annotations: Plan B.
> >
> > What is Plan B?
> 
> That is the question. I would like to confer on the status of your and
> Bijan's work on the annotation proposal, and make plans in the case that
> it is not ready, as we discussed at the F2F. I anticipate would discuss
> idea for annotations that fall short of the rich annotation proposal but
> address some of the requirements our users have articulated. We had
> postponed that pending seeing what the resolution of rich annotations
> was.
> 
> -Alan
> 
> > If we are going to discuss Annotations yet again, I think that
> pointers
> > to the proposals up for discussion are needed, and that proposals that
> > have already been discussed should have evolved to be considered for
> > re-discussion.  The only activity I see in the WG related to
> annotations
> > is my message from Monday
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Aug/0060.html
> > which contains a proposal to close ISSUE-16 by adding annotations on
> > annotations.
> >
> > peter
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:27:09 UTC