- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:22:58 +0200
- To: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'OWL 2'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi Boris, On 27 aug 2008, at 12:10, Boris Motik wrote: > Thanks Rinke. I'll implement right away your comments about the > ordering of various productions: it is clearly a good idea for the > productions to be ordered in exactly the same way as in the Syntax > document. Good! :) > The only comment I don't necessarily agree is regarding the order of > elements inside assertions. In the Syntax document, we've used > the order that is compatible with first-order logic: predicates come > before the arguments. Thus, in class assertions we have the > class expressions before the individuals, and in property assertions > we have the property, then the source, and then the target > individual. I'd prefer keeping things this way. I guess, FOL syntax aside, it depends on the perspective you have on what a ClassAssertion means: either you're saying something about a class, or you're saying something about an individual. Even though they mean the same thing, the former is more intuitive from a FOL/DL perspective, but the latter is more intuitive to users (cf. the individuals tab in Protege). I remember Alan mentioning something similar once as well in [1] (though I think the PSO vs SPO distinction is less confusing). Best, Rinke [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008May/0191.html > Regards, > > Boris > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org >> ] On Behalf Of Rinke Hoekstra >> Sent: 27 August 2008 11:49 >> To: Boris Motik >> Cc: 'OWL 2'; 'Sandro Hawke' >> Subject: Re: XML schema comments >> >> >> Hi Boris, >> >> Ok, thanks! I've entered my review comments. >> >> Best, >> >> Rinke >> >> On 27 aug 2008, at 09:53, Boris Motik wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> {{LT}}!-- comment --> has been introduced by Sandro in order to make >>> the document pass HTML validation. I once changed it into < >>> but then Sandro complained. Perhaps he can shed some more light on >>> why this is necessary. >>> >>> Regarding comments, I guess you can just add them as usual. The >>> problems with rendering might then make us handle the comments >>> sooner rather than later. :-) >>> >>> Boris >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org >>>> ] On Behalf Of Rinke Hoekstra >>>> Sent: 27 August 2008 09:38 >>>> To: OWL 2 >>>> Subject: XML schema comments >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Peter, Boris, Bernardo, >>>> >>>> I am just finishing my review of the XML serialisation, and noticed >>>> that the original OWL_XML_Schema page contains comments (in the >>>> source), which do not show up in HTML on the Wiki. >>>> >>>> Most XML comments lines have the following form: >>>> {{LT}}!-- comment --> >>>> >>>> To improve readability of the schema, I suggest to replace them >>>> with: >>>> <!-- comment --> >>>> >>>> which makes them show up in the HTML rendering. >>>> If you're ok with it, I could make the changes to the schema >>>> document >>>> (on the wiki). >>>> >>>> Furthermore, I was wondering how you would like my review >>>> comments to >>>> be added? The {[Review|~~~~|comment}} template interrupts the >>>> rendering of the schema (and the hide review button only shows up >>>> on >>>> the XML Serialization page, not on OWL_XML_Schema). Other options >>>> is >>>> to put all comments in front of the schema, or add them inline as >>>> XML >>>> comments. >>>> >>>> -Rinke >>>> >>>> ----------------------------------------------- >>>> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra >>>> >>>> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra >>>> Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 >>>> Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke >>>> >>>> Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law >>>> University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 >>>> 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands >>>> ----------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> ----------------------------------------------- >> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra >> >> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra >> Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 >> Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke >> >> Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law >> University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 >> 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands >> ----------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> > > ----------------------------------------------- Drs. Rinke Hoekstra Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands -----------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 10:23:34 UTC