W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2008


From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:43:21 +0100
Message-Id: <561F1B4D-2058-47EA-9D94-49495FB453AA@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

This is the response that Alan got from Deb:


I would like to be able to say a number of things. In my inference  
web work, I would like to be able to say about any triple  who told  
it to the system,  and what the context was at that time  (date,  
time, experiment conditions etc).
i further want to be able to say about some statement if i (or anyone  
else) believes it and the truth value. I would like to be able to let  
people such as wiki authors and users say in a (public or private)  
encoding if they believe a statement or an author or a comment.

So i really want to be able to encode comments about comments. It  
would be best if i could structure those comments in owl but if i  
just had a comment option for ANY triple - including comment triples  
- that would work.

That was why very long ago when pfps provided an early proposal that  
allowed annotations on annotations to be first class objects, i  
supported it.
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 19:43:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:50 UTC