This is the response that Alan got from Deb: Hi, I would like to be able to say a number of things. In my inference web work, I would like to be able to say about any triple who told it to the system, and what the context was at that time (date, time, experiment conditions etc). i further want to be able to say about some statement if i (or anyone else) believes it and the truth value. I would like to be able to let people such as wiki authors and users say in a (public or private) encoding if they believe a statement or an author or a comment. So i really want to be able to encode comments about comments. It would be best if i could structure those comments in owl but if i just had a comment option for ANY triple - including comment triples - that would work. That was why very long ago when pfps provided an early proposal that allowed annotations on annotations to be first class objects, i supported it.Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 19:43:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:50 UTC