Re: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed? from Alan Ruttenberg on 2008-08-19 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from August 2008)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:08:17 -0400
To: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: "'OWL 1.1'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2472A8C8-1FC9-4369-A369-DACC7B3D3156@gmail.com>

On Aug 19, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Boris Motik wrote:

> Thus, it seems to me that your proposal for resolution actually  
> means we should leave the spec as it is right now (which I fully
> support).
>
> Regards,
> 	Boris

The proposal is explicitly note the allowed punning. I don't know if  
there are candidates for punning that go beyond what I've proposed  
(ontologiesURIs?) and don't want to be surprised.

-Alan

Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 17:09:06 UTC