- From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:52:30 +0100
- To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi,
This is the preliminary agenda for this week's telecoference.
* Admin (20 min)
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments?
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (13 August)
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
# Action 176 Draft a comment on XML Schema
Datatypes 1.1 draft -- this was closed, and we approved the comments,
but it isn't clear if we agreed on what to now do with them.
# Action 177 Enact the resolution of ISSUE-126
(datatype system) in the spec / Boris Motik
# Action 193 To look into reverse mapping change
for issue 136 / Michael Schneider (email)
# Action 195 Look in to what happens with OWL-R
ruleset applied to annotation properties with subproperty axioms /
Alan Ruttenberg (email)
+ Due and overdue Actions
# Action 170 Analyze and comment on
Annotation_System_2 / Bijan Parsia
# Action 168 Test our documents for
accessibility with Robert Stevens / Bijan Parsia
# Action 174 Provide an rdf serialization for
his rich annotation proposal / Bijan Parsia
# Action 152 OWL Full Semantics / Michael Schneider
# Action 150 Initiate discussion with RIF WG and
try to reach consensus / Jie Bao
# Action 194 Come up with a proposal for
conformance / Ian Horrocks
# Action 192 Come up with proposal for UNA +
function in language by global restriction, with Mike or Evren / Diego
Calvanese
* Issues (65 minutes) - Address as many as possible during allocated time
o Proposals to Resolve Issues
+ Issue 111 (There's no way to signal the intended
semantics of an OWL document), per email
+ Issue 16 (Entity annotations status), per email
+ Issue 136 Allow the use of owl:members with
owl:AllDifferent per Michael's email
o Other Issue Discussions
+ Issue 131 We should unify OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full profiles
+ Issue 116 Should Axiomatic Triples (be) added to OWL-R Full?
+ Issue 134 Metamodel for OWL 2
+ Issue 109 What is the namespace for elements and
attributes in the XML serialization?
+ Issue 138 Name of dateTime datatype
+ Issue 130 Conformance, warnings, errors
+ Issue 118 Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential
or skolem semantics?
+ Issue 114 Which combinations of punning should be allowed?
+ Issue 133 DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA
+ Issue 137 Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces
incompatibility with OWL 1
+ Issue 139 Manchester Syntax for OWL 1.1
+ Issue 140 Allow (macro-like) shorthands for directly
referring to property chains (instead of their superproperty)
+ Issue 141 OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position
* General Discussion
* Additional other business (5 min)
Regards,
Héctor
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 16:53:10 UTC