- From: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:52:30 +0100
- To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi, This is the preliminary agenda for this week's telecoference. * Admin (20 min) o Roll call o Agenda amendments? o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (13 August) o Action items status + Pending Review Actions # Action 176 Draft a comment on XML Schema Datatypes 1.1 draft -- this was closed, and we approved the comments, but it isn't clear if we agreed on what to now do with them. # Action 177 Enact the resolution of ISSUE-126 (datatype system) in the spec / Boris Motik # Action 193 To look into reverse mapping change for issue 136 / Michael Schneider (email) # Action 195 Look in to what happens with OWL-R ruleset applied to annotation properties with subproperty axioms / Alan Ruttenberg (email) + Due and overdue Actions # Action 170 Analyze and comment on Annotation_System_2 / Bijan Parsia # Action 168 Test our documents for accessibility with Robert Stevens / Bijan Parsia # Action 174 Provide an rdf serialization for his rich annotation proposal / Bijan Parsia # Action 152 OWL Full Semantics / Michael Schneider # Action 150 Initiate discussion with RIF WG and try to reach consensus / Jie Bao # Action 194 Come up with a proposal for conformance / Ian Horrocks # Action 192 Come up with proposal for UNA + function in language by global restriction, with Mike or Evren / Diego Calvanese * Issues (65 minutes) - Address as many as possible during allocated time o Proposals to Resolve Issues + Issue 111 (There's no way to signal the intended semantics of an OWL document), per email + Issue 16 (Entity annotations status), per email + Issue 136 Allow the use of owl:members with owl:AllDifferent per Michael's email o Other Issue Discussions + Issue 131 We should unify OWL-R DL and OWL-R Full profiles + Issue 116 Should Axiomatic Triples (be) added to OWL-R Full? + Issue 134 Metamodel for OWL 2 + Issue 109 What is the namespace for elements and attributes in the XML serialization? + Issue 138 Name of dateTime datatype + Issue 130 Conformance, warnings, errors + Issue 118 Should bNodes in OWL 2 DL have existential or skolem semantics? + Issue 114 Which combinations of punning should be allowed? + Issue 133 DL-Lite Profile modified to include UNA + Issue 137 Table 4 in RDF mapping introduces incompatibility with OWL 1 + Issue 139 Manchester Syntax for OWL 1.1 + Issue 140 Allow (macro-like) shorthands for directly referring to property chains (instead of their superproperty) + Issue 141 OWL-R Rules generate literals in subject position * General Discussion * Additional other business (5 min) Regards, Héctor
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 16:53:10 UTC