- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:53:12 +0200
- To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- CC: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, 'OWL 2' <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <48B53218.7090602@w3.org>
Rinke Hoekstra wrote: [snip] >> The only comment I don't necessarily agree is regarding the order of >> elements inside assertions. In the Syntax document, we've used >> the order that is compatible with first-order logic: predicates come >> before the arguments. Thus, in class assertions we have the >> class expressions before the individuals, and in property assertions >> we have the property, then the source, and then the target >> individual. I'd prefer keeping things this way. > > I guess, FOL syntax aside, it depends on the perspective you have on > what a ClassAssertion means: either you're saying something about a > class, or you're saying something about an individual. Even though they > mean the same thing, the former is more intuitive from a FOL/DL > perspective, but the latter is more intuitive to users (cf. the > individuals tab in Protege). > > I remember Alan mentioning something similar once as well in [1] (though > I think the PSO vs SPO distinction is less confusing). > I must admit I sympathize with Rinke's, as well as Alan's view[1] on this. I look at the func. syntax from an RDF user's point of view and, well, I must admit that I continuously get confused by the order of the arguments (as well as the names, I must say). Having said that, syntax is very often a matter of taste, which means there is no real right or wrong... Ivan > Best, > > Rinke > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008May/0191.html > > >> Regards, >> >> Boris >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org >>> [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Rinke Hoekstra >>> Sent: 27 August 2008 11:49 >>> To: Boris Motik >>> Cc: 'OWL 2'; 'Sandro Hawke' >>> Subject: Re: XML schema comments >>> >>> >>> Hi Boris, >>> >>> Ok, thanks! I've entered my review comments. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Rinke >>> >>> On 27 aug 2008, at 09:53, Boris Motik wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> {{LT}}!-- comment --> has been introduced by Sandro in order to make >>>> the document pass HTML validation. I once changed it into < >>>> but then Sandro complained. Perhaps he can shed some more light on >>>> why this is necessary. >>>> >>>> Regarding comments, I guess you can just add them as usual. The >>>> problems with rendering might then make us handle the comments >>>> sooner rather than later. :-) >>>> >>>> Boris >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org >>>>> [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org >>>>> ] On Behalf Of Rinke Hoekstra >>>>> Sent: 27 August 2008 09:38 >>>>> To: OWL 2 >>>>> Subject: XML schema comments >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Peter, Boris, Bernardo, >>>>> >>>>> I am just finishing my review of the XML serialisation, and noticed >>>>> that the original OWL_XML_Schema page contains comments (in the >>>>> source), which do not show up in HTML on the Wiki. >>>>> >>>>> Most XML comments lines have the following form: >>>>> {{LT}}!-- comment --> >>>>> >>>>> To improve readability of the schema, I suggest to replace them with: >>>>> <!-- comment --> >>>>> >>>>> which makes them show up in the HTML rendering. >>>>> If you're ok with it, I could make the changes to the schema document >>>>> (on the wiki). >>>>> >>>>> Furthermore, I was wondering how you would like my review comments to >>>>> be added? The {[Review|~~~~|comment}} template interrupts the >>>>> rendering of the schema (and the hide review button only shows up on >>>>> the XML Serialization page, not on OWL_XML_Schema). Other options is >>>>> to put all comments in front of the schema, or add them inline as XML >>>>> comments. >>>>> >>>>> -Rinke >>>>> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------- >>>>> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra >>>>> >>>>> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra >>>>> Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 >>>>> Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke >>>>> >>>>> Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law >>>>> University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 >>>>> 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands >>>>> ----------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------- >>> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra >>> >>> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra >>> Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 >>> Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke >>> >>> Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law >>> University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 >>> 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands >>> ----------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > ----------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ----------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 10:53:43 UTC