public-html@w3.org from November 2007 by date

Friday, 30 November 2007

• About media=handheld? Yann
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Sam Ruby
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Sam Ruby
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Adam van den Hoven
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) James Graham
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dave Singer
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dave Singer
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Adam Roben
• ... source element (description) ... Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Martin Atkins
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) James Graham
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Justin Thorp
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Simon Pieters
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Julian Reschke
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Sam Ruby
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) T.V Raman
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Karl Dubost
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Sam Ruby
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Thomas Broyer
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Julian Reschke
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) James Graham
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) T.V Raman
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? James Graham
• RE: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) mikko.honkala@nokia.com
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Michael A. Puls II
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Jens Meiert
• Response on canvas-requirement survey Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Henri Sivonen
• Why splitting HTML5 into several specs has failed to work (Was: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status) Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Karl Dubost
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) T.V Raman
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Ian Hickson

Thursday, 29 November 2007

• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Boris Zbarsky
• [ACTION-28] Binding Timetable for HTML5 FPWD Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Julian Reschke
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Roger Johansson
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Sam Ruby
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Dan Connolly
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Ian Hickson
• Re: HTML syntax Thomas Broyer
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Karl Dubost
• Re: HTML syntax Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 28 November 2007

• Re: Doug's Intro Proposal - Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Doug Jones
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? (timestamps) Philip TAYLOR
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? (timestamps) Dan Connolly
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on James Graham
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Jon Barnett
• Re: Request for clarification on HTML 5 publication status (ISSUE-19) Dan Connolly
• Doug's Intro Proposal - Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Justin Thorp
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on Justin Thorp
• HTML WG Teleconference 29 November Chris Wilson
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Anne van Kesteren
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Joshue O Connor
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Joshue O Connor
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Ben Boyle
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Daniel Glazman
• Re: style attribute, only on font? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Lachlan Hunt
• style attribute, only on font? Karl Dubost
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Doug Jones

Tuesday, 27 November 2007

• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Joshue O Connor
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Joshue O Connor
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Joshue O Connor
• Comments on the HTML 5 Web Dev Guide Justin Thorp
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Henri Sivonen
• Fw: another table example Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• ISSUE-23 (web-forms-urlencoded-form-content-type-encoding): External conformance dependency in forms HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-22 (web-forms-file-upload-type-subtype-rfc): Web Forms 2 File Upload type & subtype RFC Reference should refer to RFC 2616 [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-21 (web-forms-file-upload-space-character): Space in pseudo-BNF for accept attribute for file upload controls [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Ben Boyle
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Lachlan Hunt
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Joshue O Connor
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users James Graham
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal the use of the section element and its potential impact on screen reader users Joshue O Connor

Monday, 26 November 2007

• Request for review on Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 24 November 2007

• How to Contribute to the HTML5 Guide Lachlan Hunt

Friday, 23 November 2007

• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Steve Axthelm
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Steve Axthelm

Saturday, 24 November 2007

• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Justin Thorp

Friday, 23 November 2007

• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Kornel Lesinski
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Terry Morris
• Re: HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 21 November 2007

• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge

Friday, 23 November 2007

• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Joshue O Connor
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Joshue O Connor
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Maciej Stachowiak
• HTML 5 Authoring Guidelines Proposal Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 22 November 2007

• Re: ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in the HTML 5 spec [HTML 5 spec] James Graham
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* ryan
• Re: Spec for email addresses with IDNs? Julian Reschke
• Re: Spec for email addresses with IDNs? Anne van Kesteren
• Spec for email addresses with IDNs? Henri Sivonen
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Joshue O Connor
• An Overview of SMIL Timing and Media Attributes for Audio and Video Objects. Thierry Michel
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? (timestamps) Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Terry Morris
• Re: use of character entities (was: Re: Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09) Henri Sivonen
• Conformance requirements for accept-charset Henri Sivonen
• External conformance dependency in forms Henri Sivonen
• Space in pseudo-BNF for accept attribute for file upload controls Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML syntax Thomas Broyer
• Re: ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in the HTML 5 spec [HTML 5 spec] Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? (timestamps) Dan Connolly
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* ryan
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dylan Smith
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Karl Dubost
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 21 November 2007

• ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm in the HTML 5 spec [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Justin Thorp
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? James Graham
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: HTML syntax Dean Edridge
• RE: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Richard Schwerdtfeger
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Edward O'Connor
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: HTML syntax Thomas Broyer
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Justin Thorp
• Re: HTML syntax Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Shawn Medero
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• HTML syntax (was: Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors*) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Community input Re: A bit of electioneering... Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Daniel Glazman
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Ben Boyle
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Justin Thorp
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dean Edridge
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Henri Sivonen
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Lachlan Hunt
• Community input Re: A bit of electioneering... Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Julian Reschke
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Karl Dubost
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Karl Dubost
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Henri Sivonen
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Ian Hickson
• Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Dylan Smith
• Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors* Karl Dubost
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue James Graham
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 20 November 2007

• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: use of character entities (was: Re: Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09) Richard Ishida
• RE: use of character entities (was: Re: Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09) Richard Ishida
• Re: Author-readable descriptions of HTML5 attribute value syntaxes Henri Sivonen
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Sam Ruby
• Author-readable descriptions of HTML5 attribute value syntaxes Henri Sivonen
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Format for type attribute value Anne van Kesteren
• Re: use of character entities (was: Re: Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Charmod NONconformance and superset encodings Ian Hickson
• use of character entities (was: Re: Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09) Martin Duerst
• adding &rle;,... for bidi (was: Re: Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09) Martin Duerst
• Charmod NONconformance and superset encodings (was: Re: Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09) Martin Duerst
• Re: Format for type attribute value Boris Zbarsky
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Maciej Stachowiak

Monday, 19 November 2007

• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Karl Dubost
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Ian Hickson
• Re: Users & Requirements for Intro Docs? - Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" Ian Hickson
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Format for type attribute value Henri Sivonen
• Re: A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Sam Ruby
• Users & Requirements for Intro Docs? - Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" Justin Thorp
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Format for type attribute value Henri Sivonen
• Re: Format for type attribute value Mark Baker
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Format for type attribute value Henri Sivonen
• Manifest file format, was: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• Re: Format for type attribute value Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Henri Sivonen
• Format for type attribute value Henri Sivonen
• Re: Opera: @media projection { .slide: page-break-after:always; } Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• Opera: @media projection { .slide: page-break-after:always; } Dmitry Turin
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• A bit of electioneering on the <canvas> charter issue Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 18 November 2007

• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke
• Feedback on "Offline Web Applications" (Editor's Draft 17 November 2007) Julian Reschke

Saturday, 17 November 2007

• Experiences at HTMLWG Meeting, November 2007 Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Fw: Identifying people at November 2007 meeting Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

Friday, 16 November 2007

• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Philip TAYLOR
• RE: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Chris Wilson
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dan Connolly
• RE: Whitespace before <head> Chris Wilson
• Re: Whitespace before <head> Garrett Smith
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dan Connolly
• Re: SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Maciej Stachowiak
• [wbs] response to 'Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element?' WBS Mailer on behalf of ian@hixie.ch
• Re: Whitespace before <head> Boris Zbarsky
• RE: Whitespace before <head> Chris Wilson
• SURVEY: Accept requirement for immediate mode graphics a la canvas element? Dan Connolly
• ISSUE-19 (html5-spec): HTML 5 specification release(s) [W3C publications] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: designMode and event listeners (detailed review of Editing) Simon Pieters
• ISSUE-18 (html-design-principles): HTML Design Principles [W3C publications] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Release "HTML Design Principles" as a W3C Working Draft Dan Connolly
• ARIA and URI based extensibility, part I (ACTION-11) Dan Connolly

Thursday, 15 November 2007

• via Google and relevant to ARIA: Introducing AxsJAX -- Access-Enabling AJAX Shawn Medero
• Re: Whitespace before <head> Nick Fitzsimons
• Re: Whitespace before <head> Simon Pieters
• Re: TPAC minutes Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 14 November 2007

• Re: Whitespace before <head> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Whitespace before <head> Garrett Smith
• Re: Whitespace before <head> David Hyatt
• ISSUE-17 (media-queries-tab-preprocessing): Vertical tab preprocessing for media queries [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Vertical tab preprocessing for media queries Henri Sivonen
• Whitespace before <head> Simon Pieters
• Re: TPAC minutes Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Re[2]: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Shawn Medero
• Re[2]: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Dmitry Turin

Tuesday, 13 November 2007

• TPAC minutes Henri Sivonen
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Adam van den Hoven
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Jon Barnett
• Re[6]: <a href=##mark> (and <a href=##:mark> ) Dmitry Turin
• Re: contenteditable and designMode Anne van Kesteren
• Re: contenteditable and designMode Anne van Kesteren
• Re: contenteditable and designMode Daniel Glazman
• Re: ins and del elements Daniel Glazman
• Re: ins and del elements Dmitry Turin
• 18-dec-2007 Daniel Glazman

Monday, 12 November 2007

• contenteditable and designMode Daniel Glazman
• ins and del elements Daniel Glazman
• section 3.5.3 scrollIntoView Daniel Glazman

Tuesday, 13 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Daniel Glazman
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: IMPORTANT: your message to public-html Brian Bober
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Jon Barnett

Monday, 12 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Thomas Broyer
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Daniel Glazman
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• The section element T.V Raman
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Jon Barnett
• Re: The section element James Graham
• The section element Daniel Glazman
• Re: Offline Web Applications NOTE proposal (ISSUE-16) Shawn Medero

Sunday, 11 November 2007

• protocol [was: Re[2]: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) ] Dmitry Turin
• Offline Web Applications NOTE proposal (ISSUE-16) Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 10 November 2007

• Re: ISSUE-16 (offline-applications-sql): charter doesn't solicit SQL expertise [HTML Principles/Requirements] Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-16 (offline-applications-sql): charter doesn't solicit SQL expertise [HTML Principles/Requirements] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-15 (immediate-mode-graphics): Immediate Mode Graphics [HTML Principles/Requirements] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• xhtml version with role, and aria- ... Richard Schwerdtfeger
• ISSUE-14 (aria-role): Integration of WAI-ARIA roles into HTML5 [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-13 (handling-http-401-status): Handling HTTP status 401 responses / User Agent Authentication Forms [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky

Friday, 9 November 2007

• ISSUE-12 (test-case-file-names): File naming format for test cases HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: SQL API -- statement syntax Jim Jewett
• Re: accessibility of video element Dave Singer
• Minutes for i18n HTML WG session together with i18n activity James Graham
• Joint meeting at TPAC from HTML and i18n core WG minutes 2007-11-09 Felix Sasaki
• Re: [homework] summary of the video (and audio) codec discussion David Dailey
• Re: [homework] summary of the video (and audio) codec discussion Dave Singer
• Re: [homework] summary of the video (and audio) codec discussion David Dailey
• Re: [homework] summary of the video (and audio) codec discussion Dave Singer
• [homework] summary of the video (and audio) codec discussion Dave Singer
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-11 (default-encoding): default character encoding [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re[2]: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Dmitry Turin
• Re: New HTML WG technical contact Olivier GENDRIN
• New HTML WG technical contact Karl Dubost
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re[2]: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Dmitry Turin

Thursday, 8 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Thomas Broyer
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• ISSUE-10 (video-smil): how similar should SMIL and <video> attribute names be? [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-9 (video-synchronization): how synchronization works for <video> is unclear [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-8 (videosync): Address concerns about synchronization of multiple videos [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• ISSUE-7 (video-codecs): <video> codec [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-6 (videoaudio): Pros and cons of keeping video and audio in the scope of the HTML working group [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-5 (button-type-radio): Is there a need to expand the available <button> types to include 'radio' or 'toggle'? [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Adam van den Hoven
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Adam van den Hoven
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) T.V Raman
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• Re[4]: <a href=##mark> (and <a href=##:mark> ) Dmitry Turin
• Typo in description of <li value="xx"> Christian Schmidt
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Thomas Broyer
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky

Wednesday, 7 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Adam van den Hoven
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• photos for meeting attendance records, please Dan Connolly
• Re: Identifying people at November 2007 meeting Dan Connolly
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Roy T. Fielding
• DRAFT minutes of joint session on ARIA embedding 6 November 2007 Al Gilman

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] Karl Dubost
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] Marcin Hanclik
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] Dan Connolly
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] Karl Dubost
• RE: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] Marcin Hanclik
• Re: ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] Dan Connolly
• ISSUE-4 (html-versioning): HTML Versioning and DOCTYPEs [HTML Principles/Requirements] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Smoothness between rational and xml (was: Gigantoredesignorrific changes to the Database API) Dmitry Turin
• Re[2]: <a href=##mark> (and <a href=##:mark> ) Dmitry Turin
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker

Monday, 5 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-2, was: Feedback on the ping="" attribute Ian Hickson
• Re: Hierarchical link types Ian Hickson
• Re: Gigantoredesignorrific changes to the Database API Dmitry Turin
• <a href=##mark> (and <a href=##:mark> ) Dmitry Turin
• Re: ARIA States and Properties Meeting Richard Schwerdtfeger

Saturday, 3 November 2007

• Re: [whatwg] Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Krzysztof Żelechowski

Monday, 5 November 2007

• ISSUE-3 (style-attribute): conformance of element level style attributes [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker

Sunday, 4 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Data Tables at November 2007 Meeting (Presentation) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Mark Baker
• Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Data Tables at November 2007 Meeting (Presentation) Dan Connolly
• Remove Commercial References in Current Draft Doug Schepers
• Re: @contenteditable versus <richtext> Andrew Fedoniouk
• RE: taking HDP seriously (was Re: HTML Design Principles to WD?) David Orchard
• Re: @contenteditable versus <richtext> Jon Barnett
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Dan Connolly
• suggestions for default character encoding section Dan Connolly

Saturday, 3 November 2007

• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Henri Sivonen
• Re: @contenteditable versus <richtext> Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: @contenteditable versus <richtext> Jon Barnett
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Fw: HTML Design Principles to WD? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Fw: HTML Design Principles to WD? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-2, was: Feedback on the ping="" attribute Julian Reschke
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-2, was: Feedback on the ping="" attribute Julian Reschke
• ISSUE-2 (PINGUI): Practicability of UI requirements for hyperlink auditing [HTML 5 spec] HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: @contenteditable versus <richtext> Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Getting started with issue tracking Shawn Medero

Friday, 2 November 2007

• Re: Getting started with issue tracking Ian Hickson
• Re: taking HDP seriously (was Re: HTML Design Principles to WD?) Dan Connolly
• Re: Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Julian Reschke
• Graceful degradation of sectioning elements Philip Taylor
• Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1) Ian Hickson
• Re: Getting started with issue tracking Shawn Medero
• Re: Getting started with issue tracking Dan Connolly
• Re: the editors and issue tracking (Re: Getting started with issue tracking) Dan Connolly
• Re: taking HDP seriously (was Re: HTML Design Principles to WD?) Dan Connolly
• Re: taking HDP seriously Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Getting started with issue tracking Julian Reschke
• Re: the editors and issue tracking (Re: Getting started with issue tracking) David Hyatt
• the editors and issue tracking (Re: Getting started with issue tracking) Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: taking HDP seriously (was Re: HTML Design Principles to WD?) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: Getting started with issue tracking Ian Hickson
• Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 Ian Hickson
• taking HDP seriously (was Re: HTML Design Principles to WD?) Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: minutes HTML WG teleconference 2007-11-01T16:00:00Z Gregory J. Rosmaita
• Re: mixing Block and Inline children Anne van Kesteren
• Getting started with issue tracking Julian Reschke
• mixing Block and Inline children Maurice
• ISSUE-1 (PINGPOST): hyperlink auditing requires use of unsafe HTTP method HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker
• Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Dan Connolly
• Re: Unconference topic suggestion: Conformance checker tests Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Anne van Kesteren
• HDP: update Anne van Kesteren
• Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Steven Faulkner
• Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: @contenteditable versus <richtext> Martin Atkins
• Re: Proposal: standardize browser specific CSS include Rene Saarsoo
• Re: Proposal: standardize browser specific CSS include Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: Proposal: standardize browser specific CSS include Philip Taylor
• Re: Proposal: standardize browser specific CSS include Andrew Fedoniouk

Thursday, 1 November 2007

• Re: Proposal: standardize browser specific CSS include L. David Baron
• Re: Unconference topic suggestion: Conformance checker tests L. David Baron
• Re: SQL API -- statement syntax Kornel Lesinski
• Re: ARIA States and Properties Meeting Aaron M Leventhal
• Re: SQL API -- named arguments Ian Hickson
• Re: SQL API -- statement syntax Ian Hickson
• SQL API -- named arguments Jim Jewett
• SQL API -- statement syntax Jim Jewett
• Storage API Jim Jewett
• Re: The only name for the xml serialisation of html5 Mark Birbeck
• Drawing agenda item for TPAC Re: some review of HTML 5 charset details w.r.t. W3C Character Model Karl Dubost
• Re: some review of HTML 5 charset details w.r.t. W3C Character Model James Graham

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2007 23:47:32 UTC