- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:30:14 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Roger Johansson <roger@456bereastreet.com>
On Nov 21, 2007, at 12:05, Karl Dubost wrote: >> A document explaining the language to authors has no business >> banning elements that the spec proper allows. (The example given is >> already banned by the spec proper.) > > Same answers. Not my decision, nor yours. For the sake of accuracy in marketing and in order to avoid author confusion, a document that banned stuff that is conforming per spec should not be marketed as author-readable reference material for HTML5 but should instead be marketed as a specification for a subset profile of HTML5. Even though it is not my decision, I'd prefer this WG put its author outreach effort into producing author-readable material about the HTML5 language proper instead of a profile. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 11:30:36 UTC