Le 30 nov. 2007 à 10:50, T.V Raman a écrit : > In my view, we will discover that failure to do that will leave > us with a language that makes it impossible to write anything > "correctly" since no one agrees on what is correct. Agreed. I keep repeating it two things are needed: 1. Parsing algorithm and error recovery for consistent handling is cool. [browsers] 2. One recommended syntax and set of elements [authors] This has multiple benefits: * encourage common practices without blocking rendering * encourage quality in expression and design (XHTML syntax woke up people with regards the Semantics) * encourage a common normalization of documents Since the launch of the HTML WG, I did a lot to advocate and to build bridges between authors/web designers community with browsers implementers explaining why it was necessary to be *able to read the Web*. Web designers made the effort to understand and accept. I would hope that Browsers Implementers make the same step towards the Web designers. That would be at least a good gesture towards the Web design community, at best that would be a way to move forward faster. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be CoolReceived on Friday, 30 November 2007 02:19:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:24 UTC