- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:15:52 +0900
- To: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Cc: fielding@gbiv.com, annevk@opera.com, public-html@w3.org
Le 30 nov. 2007 à 10:50, T.V Raman a écrit : > In my view, we will discover that failure to do that will leave > us with a language that makes it impossible to write anything > "correctly" since no one agrees on what is correct. Agreed. I keep repeating it two things are needed: 1. Parsing algorithm and error recovery for consistent handling is cool. [browsers] 2. One recommended syntax and set of elements [authors] This has multiple benefits: * encourage common practices without blocking rendering * encourage quality in expression and design (XHTML syntax woke up people with regards the Semantics) * encourage a common normalization of documents Since the launch of the HTML WG, I did a lot to advocate and to build bridges between authors/web designers community with browsers implementers explaining why it was necessary to be *able to read the Web*. Web designers made the effort to understand and accept. I would hope that Browsers Implementers make the same step towards the Web designers. That would be at least a good gesture towards the Web design community, at best that would be a way to move forward faster. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 02:19:43 UTC