- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:51:58 -0700
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "HTML Issue Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 11/2/07, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > as announced by Dan Conolly in > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Oct/0367.html>, > I've added a first issue as trial: > <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/1>. I am concerned that this issue, as described, does not follow the template and principles laid out in past posts to this working group, e.g. here: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/IssueTemplate http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0003.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0863.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0946.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0953.html Given the past volume of mail to this mailing list, it is unlikely that Hyatt and I will be able to read every mail for every issue. Having issues summarised in the above format in the wiki is much more likely to allow everyone to have their point of view considered. That is to say -- while I think the tracker is a fine tool to use to track issue discussion, please don't consider it the final word on an issue. The editors are far more likely to make sensible decisions if the issues are presented in the format described in the above-cited e-mails and template page. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson
Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 17:52:08 UTC