- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:51:26 +0000
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- CC: "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > > > James Graham wrote: > >> T.V Raman wrote: > >>> Lets just say that I continue to be sceptical about there >>> existing a language definition for authors. And as others have >>> stated, some kind of tutorial does not a language definition make. >> >> OK, let me be more specific. I suggest that the information required >> to "tell me how to write my document correctly" is in section 3 [1] >> and section 8.1 [2] of the current specification. Can you be more >> specific about why you believe I am wrong? >> >> [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#semantics >> [2] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#writing0 > > Maybe because the third line of your first reference > states "This section is non-normative" ? I believe that is in reference to section 3.1 /only/; not section 3 as a whole (see also e.g. 4.10.1, 5.1, 6.3.1). If there is a real clarity issue perhaps we could s/section/subsection/. -- "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 18:51:39 UTC