- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:52:10 -0600
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 14:13 +0000, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > According to my analysis, there were 34 members of > the WG who did not agree with the proposed publication. > > May I respectfully ask on what basis you (Dan C) have > therefore decided that 51 votes in favour represents > the consensus that is required before publication may > proceed ? I am not claiming there is consensus; there is clearly a formal objection. While consensus is always a goal, it is not required for publication: "Consensus is not a prerequisite for approval to publish" -- 7.4.1 First Public Working Draft http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#first-wd I am saying that the chairs have reviewed the responses to the proposal and the decision of the Working Group is to proceed with publication. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 16 November 2007 14:52:19 UTC